User:Blazingstar24/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Coyote(mythology)

I thought this article was well written. It had multiple sources which allows several different viewpoints. All the sources also were reliable, although most of them were not recent. It could use some modern sources. The links in the citations were all working and they supported the info given in the article. The viewpoints in the article was strictly neutral and no bias towards the info given. The talk page showed that before this article did have some problems with being bias, but it was fixed by fellow wikipedians. They also discussed changing the imagery to something more suited to the myth. The article is S rated and is part of two wikiprojects. We have only talked briefly about Coyote in class, so this article gave me more new info.

Article Topics:

New Article: Heroine's journey

-looked on the article finder and saw there was none.

-Possible sources: Maureen Murdock's book,

https://hunterswritings.com/2015/10/26/the-heroines-journey-narrative-structure/ -has lots of links to possible sources

Amaterasu:

-We didn't cover Japanese myth too much in the class.

-The talk page seems to have a lot of debate going on though so not too sure about if I would be welcome.

Persephone:

-there seems to be a lot of fixing that needs to be done from the talk page. Lots of info was leaning to bias and personal research.

Chang'e:

-page was very short

-page also only presented one version of the myth.

Adding Citation Practice: Heroine's Journey

Murdock believed that the hero's journey did not accurately represent the women's point of view in the journey.

Sites I was using: http://maureenmurdock.com/?page_id=366

https://heroinejourneys.com/heroine-journey-ii/

https://mythcreants.com/blog/using-the-heroines-journey/