User:Bledsoems/Patsy Montana/Bledsoems Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Patsy Montana

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Patsy Montana
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Patsy Montana
 * Patsy Montana

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article was very well done and has detailed information about the person in the article. The article is relevant to the person and life about that person. The article itself is very organized and thought out. The photos were also nice to see as well it gave better physical insight on who Patsy looked like and dressed like because that is an important thing to consider as a reader. The article is very positive toward this artist and has a lot of good things to share about her. The sources all look good in the article except the awards down at the bottom some of them are pages that can't be found anymore and are questionable. They just need to be changed to a source that can be found again. Each fact of the article is appropriate and has good information to support them. The article itself is well done.