User:BlessedAni/Calcinus guamensis/Amenelogoleo Peer Review

General info
BlessedAni
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Calcinus guamensis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Calcinus guamensis

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) * The articles that are well-structure, present accurate and detailed information, have clear and concise writing, properly cite their sources, and provide valuable insights into the subject matter tend to be considered as doing well.
 * 4) * Thank you, I plan to add more sources and information so that by when the final is uploaded everything is complete.
 * 5) Check the main points of the article:
 * 6) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 7) * It is essential to ensure that the article focuses primarily on the species Calcinus Guamensis and does not delve extensively into the genius or family to maintain a coherent and specific focus.
 * 8) * That is the goal to discuss not only the species itself but the family this species come from, or how they survive.
 * 9) * The article discuss only the species.
 * 10) * Yes
 * 11) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 12) * Regarding the subtitles for different sections, it's crucial to assess whether they adequately represent the content within each section.
 * 13) * I agree, with each section, I should have the right information fit for that specific section so nothing repeats through out the article.
 * 14) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 15) * Not all section are there. Only one section that is provided.
 * 16) * I plan to have more sections and gather more information.
 * 17) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 18) * Yes the writing style and language are appropriate and it can make the reader more understandable but needs more information about the article.
 * 19) * Thank you, as for the information, I will need to gather more about this species, as well as add more pictures that I can use.
 * 20) Check the sources:
 * 21) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 22) * only one source listed and the source provided based on the article but not enough information about the article.
 * 23) * Yeah I have more sources that I forgot to add onto my article, but it will be added.
 * 24) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 25) * yes
 * 26) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 27) * close to it
 * 28) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 29) * It's a high quality source but need 4 more in order to get more information about the article.
 * 30) * My main goal was to have 5 good sources that people could rely on, and not sources that aren't that high of quality.
 * 31) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 32) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 33) * Add more detailed information about the habitat of Calcinus Guamensis. Include specifics about the natural environment where they are typically found, such as specific locations, substrate preference, depth ranges, and any unique features of their habitat.
 * 34) * Thank you for the advice, I will definitely look into adding those information onto my article.
 * 35) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 36) * No, needs to research and incorporate details about the species diet and survival strategies.
 * 37) * I agree, My article is not close to done, but as I add more information, hopefully the article is fine.
 * 38) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Provide more information about the articles.
 * 39) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Nothing much because not enough information about the article.