User:Bloomsnooze/The Love Fridge Chicago/IzabellM31 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ddisario, bloomsnooze, Mikaylawtlk, dear.jang


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Dear.Jang/sandbox2


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi!

Lead: The lead describes the topic of the article in a concise manner. It gives us a good amount of information on what the article is going to be without giving away everything that will later be talked about.

Content: Is the content added up-to-date? Yes all the information starts from the year the organization was started to the present time (2020-2023)

Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the information that is given talks about the mission of the group as well as various locations where they can find a love fridge.

Organization: ''Is the content added well-written- i.e is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes''

Does the content have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes, very minor ones. I made edits to those minor errors

Is the content added well-organized? For the most part, I would say yes. The only thing I would suggest is to have the Locations as its own heading and not a subheading. Possibly even switch around the history and mission around.

Tone and Balance:

''is the content added neutral? yes''

''are there any content that appears heavily biased toward a particular position? no''

''Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from ? no''

Sources and References:

''Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The only one I'm not sure about would be the club 100 Chicago. But for the articles that are avalible they are reliable secondary sources''

''Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes''

''Are the sources current? yes from the start of the project (2020) till now (2023)''

Check a few links. Do they work? yes

For new articles: ''How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? '' For the number of sources that are available that simply don’t repeat or reword the same information and considering it still a “new’” concept, they have a good amount of sources.

''Does the article link to other articles so it’s more discoverable? Yes! The first time I read the article I  was actually going to suggest hyperlinking the different articles written about some of the neighborhoods mentioned.''

Overall impression: My overall impression of the article is good, it’s concise and gets straight to the point without having any filler information. The only thing I would suggest would be to add pictures of the fridges and the art on them that was described in the mission section.