User:BlossomN/Hydrothermal circulation/TigerERTH4303 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:BlossomN


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:BlossomN/Hydrothermal circulation
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hydrothermal circulation

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * No edit to lead, therefore no comment on it.
 * additional information and revisions are overall positive to the subsection.
 * information added helped understand the topic more and furthered already present information.
 * References present are additions to the article, properly cited, relevant, and current from reputable sources.
 * However, one reference is cited too frequently. Suggest user to read additional articles to draw information from.


 * Overall information is a good addition to the article, one last suggestion would be to find some examples that you could insert to the section. This would help increase the user's reference count as well as provide something more specific for the readers to understand the topic.