User:Blue.Slip16/Industrial waste/Mflloyd Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Blue.Slip16


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Blue.Slip16/Industrial_waste?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Industrial waste

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think your first sentence adds relevant information and it doesn't seem plagiarized to me. I think that since it is a small detail without much in depth information, due to the article covering it, it works fine.

In your draft I would make a bold heading or specify where your information will be going within the article because organizationally its hard to decipher where you are intending to place this.

Where you placed the wiki link for landfill - I don't think it's necessary cause you go on to explain the information and provide further links.

Your information up to date and relevant to the topic and you carry a neutral tone in your writing. While you have the EPA as a strong secondary source, I would recommend sourcing a few diverse sources to further your claims and provide more information/support to the additions you are making. Your information definitely adds missing pieces to the original article and expands further on the topic in an effect way. I think simply adding more diverse sources, which consequently would lead to more detail, will improve your edits.