User:BlueJay14127/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it has a C rating and looks to be about accurate. The article length is pretty short, and there are no section headers specifically telling the progress of the law or its provisions.

Evaluate the article
The lead section has what it needs and is not too lengthy.

Content is pretty sparse. There is content beneath the Origins header that could be expanded upon, such as the legislative history of the law and its provisions. Also worth mentioning that those would not be considered "Origins" of the law; a header like that indicates the section will be about why the law was introduced and the history leading up to its introduction and not information about the law itself.

Tone and Balance are good.

Sources and References are decent. Sources that are linked to the article are reliable. The page could use more links to other Wikipedia pages as many items are referenced in the article.

Organization and writing quality could be better. As mentioned before, more sections could be made to better break up "Origins" section. Writing quality in general reads a little too familiar and the article has many commas where they are not needed.

There is no Images or Media, but some should definitely be there as the article mentions a chart shown to the senate during a debate on the topic of the law.

Talk page contains no significant debate

Overall, the article seems unfinished. While the page does have good sources, the organization and writing could use more thought.