User:Bluecow4321/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Common tree frog

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose the article about the Common tree frog to evaluate because it was relevant to biology. Common tree frogs matter because they play an important role in their ecosystem. My first impression of the article is that there is a lack of information.

Evaluate the article
I will start at the beginning to evaluate the article: Common tree frog. The lead section of the article is concise and clearly explains the topic. The content of the whole article is unbalanced, there is excessive information about the range of the frog and very little on the other major sections. More sections such as the diet and predators of the frogs should be added.The content should be updated, as the most recent resource was from 2018. The sections about habitation and biology need to have citations added.The article has a neutral tone throughout and shows no signs of bias. The same website was used in two different resources. I recommend the use of more resources that are academic. Also, more diverse resources should be used such as books or scholarly articles instead of secondary resource websites. The link to the last reference listed does not work, the reference section needs to be updated. The article is well written and has no apparent writing errors. The order of the sections should be reorganised in a more logical order. It makes more sense for the Description section to follow the introduction, not the Range section. The images selected for the article could be more diverse. Instead of two pictures of a frog, I recommend adding an image for the map of the frogs' geographical range to make the article more visually comprehensible. Overall, the article is excellent in the concise and clear presentation of the information.There is proper use of redirection links, which is done consistently throughout the article. More attention needs to be focused on updating and using more reliable resources. In terms of the completeness, the article is underdeveloped and needs to be added to and updated.