User:Bluedog02/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Spinal neuron - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article because I know a decent amount about anatomy from classes I have taken, and this article was rated as a stub class article, meaning it is in need of improvement.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this article is lacking. It is only composed of two sentences that have very little to do with each other and do not flow together at all.

There is very little content in this article, there are only two sentences regarding spinal neurons and then a table that applies to nervous tissue in general (not just spinal neurons) that looks as though it was copied from another wikipedia page. There is definitely a lot of missing content that could be added to improve this article.

The article is definitely written from a neutral point of view. The information provided, though limited, is based in fact and not in opinion at all.

There is only one source cited on this article page. The citation is not even formatted like a citation, they simply provided the link to the website they got their information from, which does not seem like a reliable source at all. The author should definitely consider adding more sources to improve their content.

There is only one image included in this article, but I would say that it does enhance my understanding of the topic. However, the image is not cited at all, which is a large copyright issue. The image is well-captioned though.

There is no information on the talk page of this article, and it seems like this article has not been viewed very often. It is a part of the wikiproject physiology, wikiproject neuroscience, and wikiproject anatomy.

I think the biggest way for this article to be improved is for more information to be added and more sources to be included, especially on the image which does not currently have a source.