User:Blueflowers1000/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Wendy Hui Kyong Chun

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article because it needs improvement. I also believe current information can be incorporated. This matters because Wendy Chun is a scholar who's info should be updated. Especially if others are referencing her work and they wish to visit her page for more information on her work. I saw that there needs some updating on her selected works section. According to her Harvard page she was coauthor of a work called "Pattern Discrimination". 

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: The lead section is strong but I feel rewording the paragraph could help the flow.

Content: The article is relevant to the topic. Although I feel like an expansion on some of her theories could help this article, specifically adding more to her recent work.

Tone and Balance: This article seems neutral.

Sources and References: (Forgive me if I'm mistaken) I feel there should be more hyperlinks to concepts that are discussed so people can link to those wiki pages for more context such as hyperlinking "Social Habituation". Also, I see in the "Reference Page" that it states "Chun Also co-edited several journals and special issues:" but there are no links to them. I think those should be tracked down and included.

Organization and Writing Quality: I feel that work and influence could be organized more precisely.

Images and Media: Only one photo included. I would add a photo from a conference she spoke at.

Talk Page Discussion: The talk page is asking for more pictures. It is also discussing that it is currently a "C-Class" article. Also that an info-box may need to be added. This article could be within the realm of the Wiki Women Writers effort. Although this wiki article is set as "Low-Importance" so that leads me to believe it will not be at the top of the list to fix.

Overall Impressions: I feel this article is developed but needs updating and some fixes such as adding photos and an info-box.