User:Bluefractal/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Godfather Death:
 * Article Evaluation: The beginning section and the origin section list the same information, and one of them should be cut. The synopsis should be simplified and edited for clarity. The three sections at the end, other versions, variants, and other media are discussing similar ideas, and these sections should be overhauled into less sections with less content. Versions that are direct adaptations of the original should be categorically different that modern re-imaginings.

Option 2

 * Article title: The Master Thief:
 * Article Evaluation: The entire synopsis is written in past tense when it should be in present. (It also needs copyediting.) The information about its ATU type should not be in the analysis section, as it not analysis and this information is already mentioned at the start. Three of the paragraphs in the analysis section also shouldn't be there, as they are variants, instead. The variant list also has extraneous details on it, and it does not list its items chronologically. :

Option 3

 * Article title: Beauty and the Beast:
 * Article Evaluation: The introduction is lengthy, and sections of it could be cut or moved. The plot section has extraneous detail that make it difficult to plod through. Beaumont and Lang's versions are also crammed into the Plot section when they really should go into the variant section as their summaries are only comparing their stories to Villeneuve's. The Broader Themes and Commentary sections should also be conjoined. :

Option 4

 * Article title: Undine:
 * Article Evaluation: The Elementals section should be merged with another--or potentially cut altogether--as it does not currently serve the purpose of the article. The section titled Influences on Paracelsus is also misleading, as is the Cultural References section. There are, overall, too many sections that are not clear about their content. :

Option 5

 * Article title: Dullahan:
 * Article Evaluation: The legends section is not adequately split up into subsections. There should be a section on appearance, another on analysis, and another on variants, at least. The amount of times the article mentions the Dullahan as headless or having a severed head is also far too many, and these mentions should be minimized for conciseness. :