User:Bluemoon41/Shahjehan Aapa/LiveisGood567 Peer Review

General info
Bluemoon41
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Bluemoon41/Shahjehan Aapa
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead in concise and very much does the job. It introduces the different sections that are going to be coming up throughout the wikipage such as early life, and feminist activism. It covers everything that's mentioned throughout the article and does not mention anything that is not in article. the lead is up to date and does not miss anything throughout the article.

The content is clear and focuses not the topic at hand. The content added is up to dates and is not missing anything that I realized.

The page is well organized and clear with everything it it's right place, in my opinion.

The articles image of Mathura, India, the activist's home town. This image enhances the article in my opinion and is well positioned in the article.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic in my opinion. It begins speaking about up Shahjehan Aapa's upbringing and early life and continues through her feminism and more. It successfully focuses on her feminist activism through mentioning the organizations she was affiliated and all her accomplishments. There is nothing in this article that distracted me, everything was on point.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is very much neutral and strictly focuses on Shahjehan Aapa's feminism and achievements. There are no claims or frames that appear to be heavily biased toward a particular position. Furthermore, the person who wrote this article/ group who wrote this article did a great job in keeping any political or personal views outsides of it, and strictly reported on the facts.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, there are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented because the article as a whole focuses on Shahjehan Aapa's feminism and achievements and doesn't focus on any one event, or achievement in particular. It is a very balanced article that gives the reader a great overall view of Shahjehan Aapa's feminism and achievements.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? I have checked the citations/ references. The links all work. Based on a quick skim through a few of the pages sources, it seems that that the sources do very much support the claims made in the article. In particular, this website: https://wikipeacewomen.org/wpworg/en/?page_id=2476 very much supported the claims. I didn't find any other better sources and believe this group did a good job in selecting their sources.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There are many footnotes and hyperlinks throughout the wiki page that relate back to the sources as an appropriate and reliable reference. The information comes from neutral second hand sources such as the one I mentioned above. There is no basis abased on my analysis so far.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? I think that a little more focus on her achievements and what she actually did for work would be a good addition. Listen, there always could be things that should be added but the article does a great job in giving a balanced overall view on Shahjehan Aapa's life in my opinion.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There are many footnotes and hyperlinks throughout the wiki page that relate back to the sources as an appropriate and reliable reference. The information comes from neutral second hand sources such as the one I mentioned above. There is no basis abased on my analysis so far.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? I think that a little more focus on her achievements and what she actually did for work would be a good addition. Listen, there always could be things that should be added but the article does a great job in giving a balanced overall view on Shahjehan Aapa's life in my opinion.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? I think that a little more focus on her achievements and what she actually did for work would be a good addition. Listen, there always could be things that should be added but the article does a great job in giving a balanced overall view on Shahjehan Aapa's life in my opinion.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? I think that a little more focus on her achievements and what she actually did for work would be a good addition. Listen, there always could be things that should be added but the article does a great job in giving a balanced overall view on Shahjehan Aapa's life in my opinion.