User:Bluewildflowers/Alice in wonderland/Lkhk32 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Starlyia-@Starlyia and Starcia-@Bluewildflowers


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Alice in Wonderland (1951 film)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Alice in Wonderland (1951 film)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Starlyia and Starcia! Here is my peer review for your Wikipedia article:

I would surmise that your commentary about the ecological integrity of your movie choice should comprise examples to support the facts, a variety of sources that provide a wide range of objective information, an unbiased tone, balanced perspective, organized ideas, clear and concise sentences, and maybe even questions that challenge the ideas discussed.

I would suggest for you to talk about the anthropomorphism of the animals portrayed in the film such as the White Rabbit, the Caterpillar, the Cheshire Cat, and the talking flowers. You could also talk about the veracity of Alice’s fall through the large hole when she follows the White Rabbit, in regard to the gravity for example, and about the painting of the white roses in the Queen of Hearts’s garden.