User:Bmaghen/Sonoporation/Biubiu44 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bmaghen


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Bmaghen/Sonoporation


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sonoporation

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * wow this is so well written, low-key don't have much to say so these critiques are very niche
 * I think what you have written for the mechanism part is very concise and is supported multiple sources. If it were me, I would move or incorporate the Microbubble agents section to be under mechanism since in the lead it was mentioned that this was the factor that enhances cell uptake
 * The one sentence you added to the lead feels kinda awkward. I see that it relates to the previous statement but if you aren't going to expand upon it (adding a section about it) I would consider leaving it out.
 * The sources you added looks fine but some seem a bit outdated. I don't remember exactly but the TA said something about having sources be from the past 4-5 years.
 * If you're up to it, maybe incorporate a small section regarding application or contrast it with electroporation to round out the article. Honestly what you have written so far is already a big improvement compared to the original.