User:Bmareen18/sandbox

Article Title: Marine Ecosystems

 * Everything within the article was relevant to the topic. There was one sentence that distracted me at the end of the first paragraph. The sentence "See food chains" isn't really a sentence and is more of an afterthought to plant and animal life supporting it. These words could use a pair of parentheses around them.
 * The article appears to be neutral. No positions are stated.
 * I would like to see more information presented about the different types of marine ecosystems listed in the article, but the author does have those words linked to pages that go into detail on their respective subject.
 * The EPA link is outdated
 * The ESA link checked out and the source supports the claims in the article.
 * Not every fact is referenced and one of the sources is outdated. Both the EPA and ESA can be considered neutral sources. Unfortunately, without being able to see the EPA article I cannot determine its neutrality. The ESA journal article is a scientific study that has reported its findings and remains unbiased.
 * Although one of the sources is outdated, the information is not. This is a very general overview of marine ecosystems. Again, I would like to see just a general overview of each ecosystem so readers don't have to click on so many different links to learn about mangroves, estuaries, etc.
 * No conversations are occurring about this topic on the talk page.
 * I couldn't find a rating for this article.
 * The article is part of WIkiProject Fisheries and Fishing and WikiProject Oceans.
 * In class we are more biased when discussing the topic. As marine scientists we understand the importance of marine ecosystems and therefore automatically assume that all marine ecosystems are good for the planet.

Week 6

 * would like to add a few more details about the different types of marine ecosystems
 * know that they are hyperlinked to their own pages, but want to give the reader a quick description of said ecosystem
 * descriptions don't have to be overly long
 * basic description saying "this is what this is"
 * Ecosystems Listed:
 * Salt Marsh
 * NOAA description
 * Intertidal Zones
 * The Wild Classroom description
 * Estuaries
 * NOAA description
 * Lagoons
 * National Geographic description
 * Mangroves
 * NOAA description
 * Coral Reefs
 * Smithsonian Institution description
 * Deep Sea
 * Smithsonian Institution description
 * Sea Floor
 * change to benthic zone
 * CABI description

Article Title: Seagrass
Biggest glaring problems that need to be fixed:
 * A few sentences to reword to make the message more clear
 * Needs citations!!!
 * Some sections need restructuring so the section is more fluent

Article Title: Anaspidea

 * More detailed facts in “description” section
 * Want to be able to have readers have a sense of being able to identify if they ever find one out in the wild
 * Move part from “life habits” about how color comes from food to “description” section
 * Add citations to “life habits” and “description”“Human use” section needs citations
 * New paragraph in “human use” when talking about its use in neurobiology
 * Combine “reef aquaria” and “human use”