User:Bmassey98/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Entamoeba moshkovskii
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article after looking up common parasites. The name of this one sounded very interesting.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Slightly overly detailed

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think they could expand more in some areas.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Not all
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? There could be more.
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
 * Are images well-captioned? No images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are no conversations
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is apart of a Wikiproject Microbiology. It is not rated.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There is no conversation in the talk page.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? I think the article has the barebones of information. It can definitely be improved.
 * What are the article's strengths? It does have the basics. I think that the opening section and the diagnosis section have the most details.
 * How can the article be improved? It could be improved by having more information. Some sections only have a sentence or two. An image would also be beneficial.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It is pretty underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: