User:Bnlmg9/Sorosis/Jadrzd Peer Review

General info
Bnlmg9
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Bnlmg9/Sorosis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sorosis

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section looks good with no need for changes. The content is relevant and provides appropriate context/history. All the sources are peer-reviewed with working links. The tone is neutral and unbiased. However, the sandbox is a bit unorganized - I had a hard time discerning what parts of the sandbox were from the original article vs the user's edits/additions. I would also like to see where the additions are going to be placed within the main article. One other piece of info I would like to see is who was Kate Field in regards to the group, and why did she have power to change the name? Overall, the sandbox shows great additions that will improve the main article substantially.