User:Bnlmg9/Sorosis/Rush1970 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bnlmg9


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Bnlmg9/Sorosis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sorosis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Adding further information about the founding of the club and its rise in popularity is definitely an important edit. I found it interesting that there was such a debate about the club's name. One thing I was confused about was why Kate Field wanted to change the name and then left, so some elaboration in that aspect could be helpful. Additionally, I think it could be beneficial to have the background for the name of the club to come earlier in the section(i,e.after the first paragraph). I like the addition of citations for every sentence, even when they use the same source. This is something I will add to my draft, as it gives more context to each fact.