User:BoYangGengJackson/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Liu Sanjie

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This week, we just learned the movie The White-haired Girl. The Liu Sanjie and the white-haired Girl are both movie products of the same era and both are characters based on fairy tales. These two films marked the beginning of the independence consciousness of new Chinese women from that era and struggle between the peasants and the evil forces of the bourgeoisie, and finally win the victory. Their theme is similar, so I finally chose this Wikipedia article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

In Liu Sanjie’s article, It contains 5 main contents. Life and legend, Folk song style, Film, Impression Liu Sanjie, Impact. Each part is written around the topic of Liu Sanjie. However, some of the information is somewhat outdated, such as the impression that Liu Sanjie declared bankruptcy reorganization on August 15, 2017, and said that the actually accumulated debt of nearly 1.5 billion yuan. The movie part can be added and supplemented. The cultural background of The Times and the story content overview of the movie part are insufficient, so we can add it. After reading the whole article, the author wrote this article from an objective and neutral third perspective. There is no over-glorifying or belittling or distorting history to suit one's own purposes. This article can add some myths and legends about Liu Sanjie, and add links to some videos about liu Sanjie's movies or impressions of Liu Sanjie. And the five sections of the topic of the essay can be reinforced or written in a progressive manner to strengthen the connection between the sections of the essay. Many of the references in this article are out of date and need to be updated, thus it's hard to judge whether these material is biased or whether the sources cited are diverse and authoritative. This article is rated at C-class and it also is a WikiProject. There are no other opinions in the talk page of this article, but I think the real-time discussion in class is more interesting and lively.