User:BobEnyart

[Still active on WP in 2021, just fyi.] I think my good edit history, with about a thousand contributions as of Jan 2021, shows that I am a committed Wikipedian. That may suprise, for example, a materialist, because I am not one, though I know that WP is largely edited from a materialist perspective. So some may be surprised at the result if they Google: big bang predictions. You'll find my article at kgov.com/bbp ranked among the top five out of 7M relevant pages. The real story of bb predictions is far different than the canonical telling of the revisionist big bang story as you hear from NASA, BBC, etc.

You might also Google: evidence against the big bang. Then out of millions of pages, you can find on the first page my kgov.com/bb, but beware. It's not for the faint of heart. Yet when I edit WP articles, such as the Strong Interaction, I try to keep my own agenda at bay (unlike countless materialist/leftist editors).

Also, while WP is edited from a materialist perspective, at rsr.org/materialism we point out that all most substantive and most important things in reality are not physical including: - Numbers are not physical. - Math is not physical. - Information is not physical. - Grammar is not physical. - Logic is not physical. - Reason is not physical. - Ideas are not physical. - Science is not physical. - Concepts are not physical. - Morality is not physical. - Truth is not physical. - Souls are not physical. - Spirits are not physical. - Codes are not physical. - The square root of negative one is not physical ( used in QM and electric circuits and discussed at rsr.org/math#sq-rt-neg-one ). - Etc. (See link. Btw, Wikipedia is not physical. So it is ultimately ironic for it to be edited from a materialist perspective. We cannot attach matter to photons and transport that matter at the speed of light. Yet Wikipedia can be transmitted at the speed of light. So WP is not physical.)

And if you're a theologian, you'll be surprised at the result if you Google: is God outside of time. For years my article at kgov.com/time has been ranked highly, always on the first page of results. The story of the Bible reveals divine attributes far different than those listed by most systematic theology texts.

To understand my interest in a healthy and robust Wikipedia resource, I'll tell you about myself. I'm a radio talk show host since 1991 airing on America's most-powerful Christian station, the 50,000-watt AM 670 KLTT, online at KGOV.com and realscienceradio.com and lead curator for bflist.rsr.org, and lead researcher for dinosaursofttissue.com, youngearth.com, and 360dayyear.com.

I attempt to stay out of debates on WP's Talk pages even though professionally, as at rsr.org/debates, you can see the scores of folks I've enjoyed debating. Likewise, interviews at rsr.org/interviews (like with Lawrence Krauss, Eugene Scott, Stephen Meyer), and predictions at rsr.org/science-predictions, and our Real Science Radio Youtube videos, rsr.org and click on over to our YouTube channel, present WP type information but from a consistent Judeo-Christian biblical worldview. (Twenty-nine years of daily on-air work has alerted me that many people would like to silence Bible-believing Christians and erase them from the Web.)

Suggestions: On the Fountain disambiguation page I've suggested that Wikipedia needs an article on natural geological fountains. And on the Biblical archaeology talk page my suggestion for an External Link, after a back-and-forth discussion, was shot down.

See also rsr.org/list-of-whale-evolution-problems, rsr.org/evidence-for-the-exodus, and rsr.org/list-of-solar-system-formation-problems, rsr.org/transient-events-of-the-solar-system aka rsr.org/TESS and my radio interview with Dr. Judith Reisman, the bain of Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. Updated Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host (talk) 14:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)