User:Bobamnertiopsis/Archive8

Archived talk page discussions from October 25, 2018, through July 8, 2022.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on this user's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Your GA nomination of When Megan Went Away
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article When Megan Went Away you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Kate McComb
Thanks for the in-depth DYK review. Sometimes when I create articles on notable topics, there aren't that many sources even though they are notable which makes me worry about accidentally close paraphrasing something. SL93 (talk) 20:48, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of When Megan Went Away
The article When Megan Went Away you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:When Megan Went Away for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK for When Megan Went Away
Alex Shih (talk) 12:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Gosh, you're amazing, ! I just bookmarked it to check out next time I'm at Quatrefoil Library. Thanks for starting this article & getting it to FA status & a DYK! = paul2520 (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! It's not a great book but definitely an important one in the history of queer literature and worth checking out, especially because it's so rarely recognized. I came upon it during some research on another project and was bummed that it not only lacked an article but any mention anywhere on Wikipedia. So it felt like a good lacuna to address! —Collint c 18:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your Article Work!
Thanks for your recent content work that falls in the scope of the Children's Lit WikiProject. I wanted to let you know that you were recognized in our last newsletter. Happy editing and Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

GA review
The Quest Begins, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Drmies (talk) 19:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

File:X A Fabulous Child's Story cover.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination for X: A Fabulous Child's Story
Hello, I completed a review at Template:Did you know nominations/X: A Fabulous Child's Story. The QPQ component is still outstanding. Please post at the nomination page when completed. Cheers! Flibirigit (talk) 04:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for X: A Fabulous Child's Story
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of X: A Fabulous Child's Story
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article X: A Fabulous Child's Story you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 01:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of X: A Fabulous Child's Story
The article X: A Fabulous Child's Story you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:X: A Fabulous Child's Story for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Minnesota History (journal)
Hello! Your submission of Minnesota History (journal) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:38, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Hey there, it's been a week since my last comment here, and you haven't responded with regards to the nomination. Are you still planning to pursue it? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, I stalk your page and saw 's message. If you want help, I'd be happy to address Narutolovehinata5's concerns. = paul2520 (talk) 01:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey all, thanks for this. I've been especially swamped this week and haven't been able to give this nomination/article the attention they deserve. I feel like there are two issues here: first, the hook fact is uninteresting. I don't necessarily disagree with this but after skimming the article, don't really see a more exciting one., if you see anything that you think might be worthy of a hook, feel free to propose an alternate (and thank you for offering to help on this! You're too kind!) The other issue is the notability tag that has been placed on the article. I've located some offline sources that refer to the journal and may be of use in establishing its notability; two are listed on the article's talkpage. The first, the Review of Reviews piece, is accessible to me here in New York, I just need to take a trip to the library's microfilm room. The second, the St. Paul Pioneer Press editorial from July 27, 1939, is inaccessible to me as there appears to be no digitized copy, I don't know the page number so I can't request an interlibrary loan copy, and I'm not in Minnesota to access the available microfilm held at the St. Paul Public Library (and possibly other MN libraries, I haven't checked). So to your question, , I'm happy to withdraw the nomination unless  has a more interesting hook for now. The article is in good shape, except requiring additional notability-confirming material, and if that can be located, I might go for a GA nomination down the road and renominate for DYK if it passes. Thanks both for your care on this! Kindly yours —Collint c 03:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, ! I will take a look tonight. And am interested in helping with the GA, should you have more time in the near future. CC: . = paul2520 (talk) 12:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Minnesota History (journal)
feminist (talk) 02:13, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

revisiting List of Hennepin County Library branches
Hello again, ! I want to revisit nominating List of Hennepin County Library branches as a FL. I feel that it meets the criteria.

I believe your biggest objection in the past was that not every library has a note. Well, I think if they haven't all been renovated (or we don't have any reliable source stating they were), that's not relevant according to the FL criteria. Likewise, after perusing a few other featured lists, I feel this one is on par. Pending review, and I'd make time to address comments.

Further proof: Lauren Bacall on screen and stage is a FL that doesn't have a note for every row in the table.

What say you? = paul2520 (talk) 19:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey ! I'd be down to reexamine this page as I think it's definitely near the FL level. I agree that not all rows need a note but I think the thing to agree upon before nominating this for FL is what the notes criteria are and then making sure that those criteria are evenly applied across all the rows. Right now, it seems like the one thing we're including is whether libraries replaced older branches, so I think we should just double-check our sources to make sure that none of the branches without any notes currently have no notes because they weren't replacing any older buildings. I think it might also be a decent idea to include those branches that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places as a separate sentence in their respective notes sections. I can go through and doublecheck sources for consistent formatting/add archive links, and can make sure the table meets accessibility requirements as well. How does all that sound? —Collint c 22:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * That sounds great, ! I was planning to stop by the library anyway, so I can see if the Benidt ref is available.
 * Luckily, National Register should be entirely public, so that should be a matter of checking each library (if not already mentioned in a source).
 * Do you think we should put the year refs in a separate "Reference" column? I recently saw a use-case for copy & paste of a table off Wikipedia & having ref in the same cell results in need to pre-process. Not that this should be the only reason. We could see what other lists do. = paul2520 (talk) 22:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * We now have notes for all the libraries!
 * I ended up adding a couple lines to North Regional Library that I didn't think we needed in the table (since the table notes are more about the buildings themselves).
 * The article Southdale Library mentions renovations 1992-1994, citing memos. Right now, I'm only mentioning upcoming renovations. I feel like we could extract the citations, but I'd rather see them specifically. Thoughts?
 * Re: Washburn, I would like to check-out this at the library as a next step.
 * = paul2520 (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * See also Talk:List of Hennepin County Library branches regarding what I've been up to. = paul2520 (talk) 01:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey Collin! I updated the Washburn notes. In summary, the reference that said 1990 was not a great one, as it was an architectural/planning document in 1990, but the work was done in 1991. The Ryan reference I used is good & mentions some work/openings of other libraries, in case we want to bump it against what we already have / have another reference.
 * Any further additions/edits you want to make? Otherwise, I'd be happy to submit the nom. I haven't done it before for FLs, but I am happy to learn & do the legwork; I know you're busy! = paul2520 (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I hope I'm not being a nuisance! I went ahead and submitted the article for peer review. Will do what I can to respond to feedback.
 * I very much appreciate all the work you've put into this! = paul2520 (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey ! Thanks for putting up with my lack of communication; I appreciate too the work you've done on this, which at this point has been "most of it". I'm going to try and run through tonight for work on sources and then after the peer review we can submit to FL? —Collint c 02:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me! = paul2520 (talk) 03:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy new year, Collin! I was curious, given this is my first featured anything process, how long do we wait for feedback on Peer review/List of Hennepin County Library branches/archive1? = paul2520 (talk) 02:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Happy new year ! I actually have no insight into Wikipedia's peer review process as I've never tried it before. Why don't we give it another week or so, til the 14th, which will make it two full months and if we don't hear anything by then we can try our hands at WP:FL? —Collint c 07:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sounds great, ! = paul2520 (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * 💜 Happy Valentine's Day, . It looks like we're at two months from the Peer review submission so I'd say let's make a go of the FL process. I've taken a look at Featured list criteria and I think we can make a good case that this satisfies the criteria, in which case we can try taking it over to Featured list candidates when you're ready. —Collint c 20:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks, and happy valentines day right back at ya! 💜
 * Sure, I can review and nominate (unless you would prefer to?) tonight or tomorrow. I am traveling, but should be able to make time for this. = paul2520 (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries, I am not especially busy right now so I'll go nominate. —Collint c 21:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, ! Not sure if you saw the FL discussion. I made most of the requested changes (would appreciate your review).
 * I think the suggested merge makes sense. I have time today, and did most of a demo merge yesterday. Let me know what you think & I'd be happy to just be bold and do so today.
 * Will be sure to leave the original List page as a redirect & have the edit summary link back for attribution. = paul2520 (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thoughts? I can do this tonight, if you think the merge is a good idea. = paul2520 (talk) 20:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the slow response. I think that there's a case for this list to exist as a standalone, regardless of the quality and content of the Hennepin County Library article, but that we could certainly do more to make this clear with the expansion of the lede section. If we were to do a merge, the HCL article would need to be substantially improved if we were to nominate it for FL or FA, considering there's a great deal of system history not currently reflected in the article. I think perhaps our best bet is to try to improve the list as is for now by expanding discussion of the trajectory of branch openings and the reasons the HCL (and Minneapolis Public Library before it) opened branches where and when they did. This would allow us to keep the current FL nomination open, if we want that, or we could withdraw the nomination for now, do more work, and renominate once we feel the article is ready, without the time pressure of an ongoing FL. Let me know what you think! —Collint c 21:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

No worries! I'm just excited to move forward on this process.

I could see either way, per your comments... do you think we could just push back keeping the list as-is? The commenters (link for reference) seem to be suggesting rather than insisting on the merge.

Do you think there are more refs supporting the "branch" trajectory of HCL/MPL? I thought we did a pretty good search about the branches themselves. = paul2520 (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I recently got access to Newspapers.com which has a ton of archived newspapers from Minnesota. I'm guessing there's a lot more detailed content in there about individual branches and possibly about city and county plans for branch expansion. (If you'd like access too, head over to The Wikipedia Library and request it!) Let me poke around Newspapers.com to see what I can find for a few days to see if there's enough to expand the list without having to combine it. —Collint c 01:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Good call. I put in a request to renew my subscription. I've used it in the past, but not so recently. = paul2520 (talk) 13:21, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Good news -- I got my access renewed, for both Newspapers.com and NewspaperARCHIVE. I don't think I'll have time today, like I had hoped. But I can see about doing some research this week. = paul2520 (talk) 00:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey Collin! I hope you're doing OK with quarantine. I've seen some productive edits from you lately, so that's encouraging :-)
 * Just wanted to see if you saw my reply on the FL candidate page. Does my proposed change make sense? I'd like to make some progress on the FL. = paul2520 (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for checking in. Sorry my mind hasn't been with this project in the last couple weeks. I'm not sure exactly what the consensus at the FL nomination page is right now–to move some (or all) of the text to the main Hennepin County Library page? To try and keep them separate? If we want to combine them then the resulting HCL page will not be ready for a Featured Article nomination, and the List of branches will no longer exist. If we want to keep them separate, I think more work still needs to be done to beef up the List of branches which I started work on a few weeks ago and made some decent headway on. In any case, let me know where you're at so we can effectively collaborate here. Kindly —Collint c 20:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response, . Totally get it that your mind is elsewhere. These are crazy times.
 * I personally feel sort of "in limbo"... when the responses first came in, I actually did a trial merge (and intentionally didn't publish it until we spoke). I feel confused on what the best route forward is: (a) do we call the review comments consensus that the page should be moved?, or (b) kinda with you that the list makes sense. But I'm fine merging & doing the leg work. Would be fun to do a FA, and still have the same table.
 * I guess I can go either way, and will defer to you since you started the list in the first place! = paul2520 (talk) 22:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey ! Just wanted to check-in. What's the next step for the FL? = paul2520 (talk) 04:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Congrats and thanks for all your work on this project! Thanks for pushing this project forward! Kindly, —Collint c 00:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Likewise, Collin -- it's been a joy working with you.
 * I submitted it at, condensing the lead into the sentences that might be most interesting to casual readers. Feel free to edit.
 * I wasn't sure if there was a day/week to suggest... ideally some anniversary, or if we knew the system was completely opening again! = paul2520 💬 18:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Congrats ! Way to push the list forward, it's nice to see it on the main page today! —Collint c 17:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to collaborate again on a FL/GA/whatever! Also you can definitely add a new star to your userpage ;-) = paul2520 💬 18:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Brownie Lake
Hello! Your submission of Brownie Lake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Brownie Lake
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 03:08, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Prince and the Dressmaker
Hello! Your submission of The Prince and the Dressmaker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Achaea (talk) 20:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Prince and the Dressmaker
Gatoclass (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Dua Saleh
--valereee (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

RfC on Minneapolis city history
Hi Bobamnertiopsis. Your help would help at Talk:Minneapolis. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future
The article Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future
The article Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rags Parkland Sings the Songs of the Future for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Tank (theater)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Tank (theater) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Tank (theater)
The article The Tank (theater) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Tank (theater) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Tank (theater)
The article The Tank (theater) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Tank (theater) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Australian Journal of Herpetology
Hello! Your submission of Australian Journal of Herpetology at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Laura Dean Keeps Breaking Up with Me
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Australian Journal of Herpetology
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Australian Journal of Herpetology you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ajpolino -- Ajpolino (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Nokomis East Neighborhood Association for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nokomis East Neighborhood Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nokomis East Neighborhood Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Namiba 17:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Spoonbridge and Cherry
— Maile (talk) 00:06, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Australian Journal of Herpetology
The article Australian Journal of Herpetology you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Australian Journal of Herpetology for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ajpolino -- Ajpolino (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Australian Journal of Herpetology
Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  00:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Cottontail on the Trail
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cottontail on the Trail.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cottontail on the Trail.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

George Floyd protests
If you are able to, the article George Floyd protests in Minneapolis–Saint Paul, the background section in particular, could use greater depth and more contributor voices. The main George Floyd protest article has become about the global protest movement and it lacks much if any Minneapolis-specific background that seems relevant and notable to explaining the result of Floyd's death.VikingB (talk) 16:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up! —Collint c 16:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Orca's Song
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

DOIs at Wikijournal of Science
I just dropped you a note on your talkpage over at WJS, re adding of further DOIs to an article. Cheers! -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Bobamnertiopsis. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Hennepin County Library branches – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 2. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Orca's Song
The article Orca's Song you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Orca's Song for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020 GAN Backlog drive!
-- Eddie891 Talk Work 16:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Australian Journal of Herpetology
Hi, Sorry for not responding to your pings on the Australian Journal of Herpetology FAC - I've been flat out for the last couple of weeks, and haven't had much time for Wikipedia. I was planning to post a support today, but am pleased to see that the FAC has been closed as successful - congratulations. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 05:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! Your comments helped improve the article and I appreciated getting the chance to engage with them! —Collint c 06:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

In appreciation
Shucks! Thanks, I've been kicking around this site for 14 years and only finally got around to crafting an FA. —Collint c 22:13, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, no need to rush things, and that was a quality article - worth the wait. But be warned, generating FACs can be habit forming. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, I hope so! Now that the seal's broken, who knows what's next! —Collint c 22:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Anti-Princess Series and Anti-Hero Series
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Nadia Fink
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Congratulations! With 18,024 combined views, your Fink/Anti-Princess hut hook is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of December. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 09:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Winsted Municipal Airport
Hello! Your submission of Winsted Municipal Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ktin (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Winsted Municipal Airport
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Featured Article Review for The Country Wife
I have nominated The Country Wife for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Beland (talk) 20:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Dragon and the Doctor
~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 12:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Maiden & Princess
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Australian Journal of Herpetology
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 18, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/March 18, 2021. Congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

your signature does not resemble your user name, that may cause confusion if that bothers you.

I have worked on a couple of articles that mention the above journal, some years ago, so my curiosity is piqued to see it appear at FA. Illuminate me on how this obscurity fell on your desktop :) ~ cygnis insignis 15:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello ! Thanks for the message! What was the origin of all this, good question? I was looking something or other up about some turtle on Google Scholar a few years back and encountered one of Raymond Hoser's papers from his self-published journal. My immediate response was absolute bafflement; I fell down the rabbit (snake?) hole that is the controversy surrounding his prolific (self-)publication history and in the process discovered the controversy surrounding Wells and Wellington's papers in the AJH in the '80s. Whereas the AJH case was largely resolved in 1991, Hoser's case with the ICZN is still ongoing so it felt a lot more achievable to write a complete and coherent article about Wells and Wellington's work. It was also a good opportunity to get acquainted with the rules of nomenclature, which was largely unknown to me before the writing process. I hope you enjoyed the article! —Collint c 15:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I had a little to do with the Hoser article: https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=Cygnis+insignis&page=Raymond_Hoser&server=enwiki&max= and split out some stuff on Venomoids when prompted by a reference to WP:Coatracking - sigh. ~ cygnis insignis 16:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you today for Australian Journal of Herpetology (renamed Wells and Wellington affair), indroduced "Perhaps surprisingly, there are no FAs about academic journals! The Australian Journal of Herpetology might seem at a glance like an inauspicious choice to be the first contender: the journal published just four issues and a supplemental series between 1981 and 1985 before disappearing. However, behind these numbers is a wild story about two rogue researchers (one an undergrad student, the other a high school teacher) who commandeered this unassuming journal and published three papers of their own with no peer review in which they collectively proposed "more taxonomic changes [to Australia's reptiles] than had been proposed by all other authors in the previous decade." Their efforts ignited controversy in the herpetological community, leading to an appeal to the highest body in faunal scientific nomenclature to officially suppress their work. Did it succeed? And what aftereffects of their "terrorist tactics in taxonomy" are still felt today?"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Dragon and the Doctor
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Dragon and the Doctor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Dragon and the Doctor
The article The Dragon and the Doctor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Dragon and the Doctor for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Dragon and the Doctor
The article The Dragon and the Doctor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Dragon and the Doctor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Richard W. Wells
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Opinion on a Cusi Cram image?


Hi. I found a Creative Commons Attribution licensed video https://vimeo.com/125513786 with fine images of maybe 20 actresses and female directors that we have articles for, and am in the process of uploading screenshots for them. However, I'm only 80% sure which one of them is Cusi Cram, which is an article you wrote, so I hope you can confirm: in the purple, at 0:30, is that her? (Most of the others are clear, but for this one, her appearance seems to have changed somewhat drastically over the years, weight, hair length, hair color, all of that.) --GRuban (talk) 22:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, great find with this video! I feel pretty confident that you're correct that this Cusi Cram, I watched through the video and didn't see anyone else who seemed like it was more likely to be her. Thank you! —Collint c 00:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * --GRuban (talk) 13:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anti-Princess Series and Anti-Hero Series
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anti-Princess Series and Anti-Hero Series you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DMT biscuit -- DMT biscuit (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anti-Princess Series and Anti-Hero Series
The article Anti-Princess Series and Anti-Hero Series you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anti-Princess Series and Anti-Hero Series for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DMT biscuit -- DMT biscuit (talk) 23:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Prince and the Dressmaker
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Prince and the Dressmaker you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 05:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Prince and the Dressmaker
The article The Prince and the Dressmaker you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Prince and the Dressmaker for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 09:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nadia Fink
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nadia Fink you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Isabelle Belato -- Isabelle Belato (talk) 16:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nadia Fink
The article Nadia Fink you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nadia Fink for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Isabelle Belato -- Isabelle Belato (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maiden & Princess
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maiden & Princess you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Isabelle Belato -- Isabelle Belato (talk) 02:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maiden & Princess
The article Maiden & Princess you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Maiden & Princess for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Isabelle Belato -- Isabelle Belato (talk) 16:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Winsted Municipal Airport
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Winsted Municipal Airport you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Winsted Municipal Airport
The article Winsted Municipal Airport you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Winsted Municipal Airport for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maiden & Princess
The article Maiden & Princess you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maiden & Princess for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Isabelle Belato -- Isabelle Belato (talk) 23:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Winsted Municipal Airport
The article Winsted Municipal Airport you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Winsted Municipal Airport for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

DYK for Lots of Mommies
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lots of Mommies
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lots of Mommies you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 12:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WordGirl title card.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WordGirl title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 17:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lots of Mommies
The article Lots of Mommies you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lots of Mommies for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 05:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Individual digital cartoons has been nominated for deletion
Category:Individual digital cartoons has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

NYC Wiknic, June 26
Hold the date. Meetup/NYC Wiknic in Crotona Park, Sunday June 26.

Watch Meetup/NYC/Wiknic June 2022 for further details as they become available.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Under the Christmas Tree
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

June 22: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Sun June 26: Bronx Wiki-Picnic
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)