User:Bohne086/Sulfate aerosol/Sima0063 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bohne086


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bohne086/Sulfate_aerosol?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sulfate aerosol

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead is concise and describes the important information that pertains to the article. The lead describes all of the relevant information on the article and opens with a nice introduction to the topic.

Content

The content added is suited for the topic and goes over the basic information that would be needed to know. The information is up to date and is cited with recent sources that pertain to the information.

Tone and Balance

The tone of writing is passive and non-biased. The information added connects to the overall topic and provides valuable information on the topic.

Sources and References

The sources used are primary sources that provide current information not he topic. The sources are properly cited in the article and the links to the sources are working.

Organization

The content does not have any spelling errors, and was written in a concise and easy way to understand the material.

Images and Media

The image added is relevant to the topic and shows how the topic is related to release across the planet. The caption is clear and concise.

Overall Impression

Very well written article, and it provides a lot of great information on sulfate aerosols. I didn't find anything that needs to be fixed.