User:Bola0657/sandbox

What is a content gap & ways to identify a content gap
A content gap when referring to Wikipedia is when there are no research or very little research on the content someone is trying to find. Some possible ways to identify a content gap on Wikipedia is when there is limited or no information on a topic or area of study that someone is trying to find information on.

Reasons why content gaps may arise & how to fix them
Some reasons why content gaps may arise in writing is due to the limited amount of research done on a topic or area of study making information about that specific topic or area of study to be limited or non-existent. There are many ways in which you can fix content gaps in writing but two specific ways that someone can fix a content gap is to perform research on a topic or area of study that has limited information on it such as conducting surveys or asking questions to experts on the topic or in the area of study you are trying to find more information on.

Does it matter who writes on Wikipedia?
Wikipedia gives the ability for anyone to edit content that already exists on Wikipedia as well as being able to add new information or start new pages about topics that currently do not exist on the site already. It does not matter who writes on Wikipedia as long as whatever is written is not plagiarized and have credible sources to back up the information that is being added to the site.

What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia and how is it different from my definition of "bias"
To be "unbiased" on Wikipedia is to not have any biased opinions within your writing. On Wikipedia, there should be nothing bias in your writing; what you write on Wikipedia should be written in a neutral tone and should be backed up by credible sources. My definition of being bias is favouring one side of an argument or the other side of the argument as well as claiming that the side you favour is the side everyone should favour. Wikipedia's definition of being unbiased and my definition of bias are similar because Wikipedia wants the writing on the site to be unbiased and I see being bias as an unfair opinion on one side of a topic and not having enough information in order to make an educated opinion on what you would want to believe.