User:BonklesMcGinty/Evaluate an Article

Environmental Values

Environmental Values

Everything in this article is relevant to the topic, there is no excessive information. In fact, it seems to need more information and reputable sources to make it a fortified article.

The information seems to be a bit out of date, as the history timeline of the journal skips from 1992 to 2007, then to 2013l and finally to 2013 and there is no further information. The reader does not know what happened in between those wide gaps in years, and they do not know if the journal is still active, or where it is today. This should be added alongside updated, current sources to back it.

I don't have knowledge of this exact journal, so I'm not sure if any populations are marginalized within the article. However, no populations behind the scenes are mentioned - for example, the people working for this journal are not mentioned besides the editors. It would be interesting to know more details about the staff working for the journal during the late 90s and how it has changed since.

Overall, I think the article needs a more concrete, clear structure with several headings, maybe one about the creation/history of the journal, one about the contents of the journal, one about the editors, and one about the staff. It also needs more information and more reliable sources. The article does a great job at staying neutral and displaying information in a clear, succinct way.

~