User:Bonnie Weglin/Admiral Theater/ThomasSavage111 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Bonnie Weglin's article: Bonnie Weglin
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Bonnie Weglin/Admiral Theater

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The updated version contains a lot more information that was not included in the original article. The new information is relevant to the theater and is very interesting.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes the intro sentence explicitly what the article is about. Maybe include the exact address of the theater, like address or basic neighborhood description?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No. The article is not broken into sections. Instead it is one large section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, there is no information missing in the article that is included in the lead.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Depends on the way you break up the information. Right now it may be overly detailed if you were to call the all the content part of your lead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes


 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes it contains information all the way from the grand opening of the theater to the present day.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? It would be really cool to see photos of the theater. Any from when it was first built to current day.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes for sure.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No. The article takes an overall historic approach to the theater, if there is any other information or relevant content that is not directly about the history it would be nice to include.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, actually a surprising number of sources on something that you wouldn't think has that much information written about it.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes all the articles are current to the time in which they need to be. Old articles referring to things that happened in the past.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they ALL work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Not really. It would be nice to see the article broken into sections instead of a larger piece of text. It might make it easy to read through.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Not really. There is one small thumbnail on the side of the article. Are there anymore really cool vintage photos you would use?
 * Are images well-captioned? NA
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? NA
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? NA

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes. A lot more complete when it comes to the history of the physical remodels of the theater and the ownership chain.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Very accurate and backed by reliable sources of information.
 * How can the content added be improved? It would be nice to see the content a little more organized in terms of having more sections and including photos. Is there any more content relevant to the theater that is not about the history (like construction and ownership)? Did anyone famous every go there? Is it a historic monument?