User:Bonniealves1/Lorraine Rothman/GMcuevas Peer Review

Peer review
The article covered significant accomplishments in the life of Lorraine Rothman. Lorriane Rothmans' motive to provide a kit to help women control their bodies was also stated, which allowed the reading to understand what she was fighting for. I think it would be great to incorporate what the menstruation kit is and how it works. Abortion has always been a controversial topic, which I think the article discussed about abortion and was sensitivity to the people that might feel offended by such intervention.

General info

 * The worked reviewed is Lorraine Rothman's article
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * The introduction sentence covered information about the founder, the topic, and the possible discussions.
 * The article describes the main points of the discussion and provides examples as comparison to prove Lorraine Rothman's point: to support women have control over their body.
 * The article does not covered any other information that could be misinterpreting the article or misleading.
 * The lead provides the information needed.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The content is relevant to the topic. Discusses why Lorraine Rothman thought of this menstruation kit and if offered history about abortion which relates to the topic.
 * The content is up to date.
 * The only content the article is missing is to describe what a menstruation kit consists of and how to obtain it.
 * The topic covers a sensitive topic, abortion.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The tone of the article is neutral, yet explains the importance to allow women to practice that provides them control.
 * The article does not have or express any biases.
 * The point of the article was concisely presented.
 * The article does not try to convince anyone of Lorraine Rothman's beliefs, but it brought questions of safety utilizing the device.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Resources are reliable
 * Sources are current, ranging from 2002 to 2020
 * with the exception of an ISBN number provided in the references, all articles were accessible and reliable.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content is easy to read and smooth.
 * No grammatical errors observed
 * The organization of the article makes it easier to read and locate information

Images and Media
Guiding questions: No images were added to the article



For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?