User:Boomshaqui/Highland Rape (Alexander Mcqueen collection)/Mackenzieallard Peer Review

General info
Boomshaqui
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Highland Rape (Alexander McQueen collection):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
- Lead is strong and clear

- Brief description is provided, well written

- Small content text box is helpful in presenting what will be discussed in the article

Content
- Each section is very clear, detailed and unbiased

- well separated and organized

- It does fill an equity gap as McQueen was a part of the LGBTQ+ community, the article detailing his work creates space for creators of said community

- Though he was and still remains a recognized figure in the fashion world, this article provides important information regarding a collection that earned the creative his place in the industry.

Tone and Balance
- Tone is clearly unbiased

- Though there is discussion of the reaction McQueen's Highland Rape collection, it is matter of fact

- No perspectives are overrepresented or underrepresented

- No position is clearly favoured

Sources and References
- Extensive list of sources

- Good variety amongst sources

- Though there are primary sources used, they are supported by a variety of secondary sources.

- Not all sources have live link, maybe add that if possible, they work if copy and pasted when searched however so no issue with sources being invalid

- Sources are current

- No better sources

- Very diverse, journals, books, websites are all used, variety of authors as well

Images and Media
- Images provided are relevant and important visuals regarding the information in the article

- Images are well captioned

- Appealing visually and aesthetically

Organization
- very well-written, clear and easy to read

- no grammar or spelling errors detected

- Content is notable

- Follows pattern of other articles regarding similar content

- Article does link to other wiki pages, making it discoverable

Overall
- Article is very well-written, visuals are relevant and sources are valid and varied

- Only improvement would be to make the links live but aside from that there is nothing that stood out