User:BornUnderPunches/Frankenstein's Monster/Roghikt Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

BornUnderPunches


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BornUnderPunches/Frankenstein's_Monster?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Frankenstein
 * Frankenstein

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

I thought your opening sentence was strong and identified were the paragraph was heading. It was concise but at the same time provided the reader with a clear understanding of the material bring presented.

Content:

The content being added is relevant to Frankenstein. I thought this was a good section to add as it is not discussed in the current version of the article. All the topics touched on in your paragraph were relevant and accessible to the readers. You need a good job not over complicating the material.

Tone and Balance:

I thought the content added was neutral and did not push a personal opinion. Your paragraph had a nice flow, as the tone remained the same throughout the piece.

Sources and References:

you did a job job citing your sources. From what I could tell the sources you used were reliable. You also did a good job using current sources which reflect the current understanding of the material and historical context.

Organization:

Your paragraph is well-written and easy to read. It has a goof flow and is clear. I did not notice any spelling or grammar errors in your work. Overall, Your work is well organized and easy to follow.

Images and Media:

N/A

Overall Impressions:

Overall, I thought your section on Frankenstein's monster was really well done. Your material was well organized and easy for the reader to understand. You did a good job keeping it concise while also covering all the important points. Your paragraph was well edited, as I did not come across any spelling or grammar mistakes. I think the definitions you added in the text will be helpful to readers. Overall, you did a good job making sure the material was able to be understood by a large audience.