User:Boson/Sandbox2


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good work, but a few things need fixing.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * A few issues with readability, grammar, and spelling. Will be detailed below.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Copyright issue with the Monopoly board. The problem is with the underlying Commons image which is incorrectly tagged (clear copyright notice on the image itself).
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Copyright issue with the Monopoly board. The problem is with the underlying Commons image which is incorrectly tagged (clear copyright notice on the image itself).
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: