User:Boston/DYK Talk

 -  



DYK Larz Anderson Bonsai Collection
Did you know the Larz Anderson Bonsai Collection in Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts has a Hinoki Cypress over 250 years old?

DYK Shreve, Crump & Low
Did you know that Shreve, Crump & Low, the oldest jeweler in North America, opened across the street from the smithy of Paul Revere and has designed such prestigious awards as the Davis Cup and the Cy Young Award?


 * Cool it made it into Did you know Congrats Markco1 21:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Good work, but a question: when you write "In the 1800s, the firm changed its name...", do you mean 1800s as in 1800-1809, or 1800-1899, in which case "the 19th century" would be more appropriate? Biruitorul 02:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

The source material indicates that it was between 1800-1809, but there is some ambiguity as no exact date is given. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 23:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks a lot. Biruitorul 03:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK Castletownroche
Did you know that shortly before Christmas 1942 a man believed to be a Nazi spy walked into the small Irish village of Castletownroche and was apprehended by the Garda?

DYK Goodyera
Did you know that the 25 species of Goodyera comprise just one of over 800 genera of orchids? Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  21:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK Carron
Did you know that the Carron, a river in the Scottish Highlands only about 23 km long, has given its name to a type of naval cannon, a line of bathtubs, two warships and an island in the Southern Hemisphere? Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  18:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK Trepanging
Did you know that trepanging is the harvesting of sea cucumbers and Macassan trepangers traded with Indigenous Australians generations before the arrival of Europeans?

DYK Taniusques
Did you know that Tantiusques, a graphite mine which John Winthrop the Younger purchased from the Nipmuck in 1644, became the basis for today's Dixon Ticonderoga pencil company?

Thank you for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  21:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK Lake Chaubunagungamaug
Did you know that Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg is often cited as the longest place name in the United States? I had to shorten the DYK. It still affected the main page, so I left it as: ...that Lake Chaubunagungamaug is often cited as the longest place name in the United States?  Nish kid 64  18:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * It would be a nice place to swim, especially if you would like to tell your friends where you swam :). - Darwinek 21:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK James Brown Is Dead
Did you know that "James Brown Is Dead" is an electronic dance music reference to James Brown and the widespread sampling of his music?

Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  21:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK Great Trail
Did you know that the Great Trail created by Native Americans connected the Great Lakes region of Canada to New England and the mid-Atlantic and laid the foundation for modern highways?

Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  21:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello. As an interested reader, my first reaction to "Some sources describe the Great Trail as beginning at one point or another." was: where? In the interest of completeness (or even NPOV), I think it's a good idea to include the most common examples. If it's a really marginal issue, then I would take the sentence out because it seems to leave a noteworthy point unexplained. Just a friendly suggestion. -- bcasterline • talk 06:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your note about your edit at Great Trail, have noticed a word left out that I will replace. I'll also take up a little further discussion at Great Trail under "discussion", Talk:Great Trail so it is available at the article. See you there... 83d40m 16:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I moved this useful discussion to Talk:Great Trail. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 04:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK Sleeve garter
Did you know that sleeve garters were first used in the 19th century and are still worn by poker dealers and barbershop musicians?

DYK Espiritismo
Did you know that Espiritismo is the Latin American and Caribbean belief that good and evil spirits can affect health, luck and other elements of human life? Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  23:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

DYN Botánica
Did you know that a botánica is a Latin American store that sells religious goods, magical paraphernalia and brand name health care products? Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  21:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Ichabod Washburn
Did you know that the university mascot called "the Ichabod" is named after Ichabod Washburn, an owner of the world's largest wire mill? Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  03:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Haghpat Monastery
Did you know that Haghpat Monastery in Armenia was placed on the World Heritage List over 1,000 years after it was founded? Thanks for your contributions! ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 17:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Normal School for Colored Girls
Did you know the Normal School for Colored Girls was incorporated into the University of the District of Columbia?

Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  00:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Edmonson sisters
Did you know that the Edmonson sisters were African American slaves who tried to escape to freedom and became celebrity abolitionists?

Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  15:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Ani
Did you know that Ani, a medieval city once rivaling Constantinople, was ransacked by Mongols and now stands in ruin?

DYK Landmarks Foundation
Did you know that the Landmarks Foundation helps conserve sacred sites such as the stone spheres of Costa Rica and the moai of Easter Island? Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  14:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Shambala
Did you know...that the song "Shambala" by Three Dog Night has a gospel music sound and Tibetan Buddhist subject matter? Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  22:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Hazel Lavery
Are you sure about your edit that the Lady Cunard mentioned is the wrong one? The parentage of Nancy Cunard seems to support the statement that the widow of the 3rd Baronet was indeed the person referred to. MisfitToys 22:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * When you added the link to Nancy Cunard, I failed to note the where the "#" went to. Therefore I thought that I had the wrong Cunard in the first place and removed the endnote that indicated she was a Cunard by marriage whereas Nancy was a born Cunard.  Realizing now that I had identified her correctly in the first place, what I should have done (if anything) was just specifically identify her as the former Maud Alice Burke.  Am I on the mark now?  House of Scandal 23:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I think we have it now. MisfitToys 23:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, thanks for your interest in the Hazel Lavery article. Until I started expanding the stub, I had no idea about her connections to Michael Collins, etc.  It's fun when a subject matter leads us in an unexpected direction. House of Scandal

DYK Chroogomphus
Hi. Could you deal with the merger issue for Chroogomphus rutilus one way or another and perhaps expand this article just a little? Drop me a line as soon as you do and I will place it on the main page DYK. Thanks. House of Scandal 10:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC) I expanded Chroogomphus in a major way. I'd say it's more than ready for DYK now. House of Scandal 16:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * OK - merged two stubs but I am knackered and need to sleep. Will try to do a bit later cheers Cas Liber 12:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I was majorly tired and just needed to crash. Cas Liber 19:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ...Actually, the page has turned into a nice little page really :) If you have any interest in fungi and have an idea on how easy or difficult any page is to turn into an FA, why not drop into here and cast your vote and we'll try a concerted attempt at an FA. (DYK there are no fungal Featured Articles on wikipedia at all?) I've modelled this on the dinosaur collaboration which has yielded a few FAs.

Link here......Fungi Collaboration

cheers Cas Liber 19:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Loosejock
The contents of this page are going to be sent to template:did you know, which is transcluded onto the main page, so I reverted your comment on the Ira Goldstein article. I'd suggest bringing your concerns up with whoever added it to the page. Picaroon 00:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * On another note, I probably should've used a better edit summary - sorry if it sounded a bit curt. Picaroon 00:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged it for speedy delation. Is it appropriate to remove it from the update list? It was put there by the article creator. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 00:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, that was completely my mistake - I thought you were talking about Ira Goldstein. Yes, authors shouldn't be adding their own work, and Bakasuprman already removed it. Sorry about this. Picaroon 00:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Even if you misread, we're both just working to maintain standards...unlike the Lenny Loosejock article creator. Happy New Year. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 00:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I nominated your botánica article for DYK (its the first article I've nominated). I am surprised that there wasn't an article for that before 5 days ago! I found the article by seeing it linked to the botanica article. Shaundakulbara 18:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I think you're doing a very fine job with the DYK nominations! --Cheers, Camptown 18:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Armenia articles
Thanks and happy new year ill work on them. Nareklm 11:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)it too :)
 * Hey i broke it down to sections tell me what you think the block quote looks confusing thanks. Nareklm 21:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Damn sorry about that i didn't know it was a quote lol. Nareklm 21:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, blockQUOTES are quotes. I caution you to make edits and additions more carefully. I thought you weren't a native speaker of English until I saw your user page and it says you are. This means that you've just been careless again and again. That's harmful and irresponsible. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal   21:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No i just didn't know what that means and i didn't know we can't break it down to sections and i know what a quote is. Nareklm 21:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Randy Shilts
Done. I knew the article needed more work, but your offer inspired me to finish it out. Thanks. Shilts was a helluva guy, he deserves to be remembered. --Textorus 08:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Appreciate the compliment, bud. Thanks much for getting it on DYK.  Take care.  --Textorus 08:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

2-Methylhexane
I'd be fibbing if I said I reallty grok what the 2-Methylhexane article is about, but it was good to see a nice, estoeric chemistry article there giving DYK some variety! It's usually mostly history. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 09:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It's really nice that you read the article and reported to me that you have no interest in the topic - it showed some sense of readership, even though you didn't like the thing at all. In my opinion, things on DYK should be a bit bizarre in order to be special and note-worthwhile. Therefore, it should be nice to have some strange articles appearing on DYK, one of them might be 2-Methylhexane. --Deryck C. 09:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Millennium City
I thought Millennium City, Hong Kong had real DYK potential but could see it had some problems too. I cleaned up the grammar and added citations and a few more facts so it would be appropriate. I think we should strive to have at least one DYK per group concern Asia, Africa or South America rather than Europe and the USA. Technically, the Haghpat Monastery is in Asia, but its Near East rather than Far East. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal   10:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * In fact I also believe the article has potential. However I must admit that there are not many things in China which deserves an article but does not yet have one. This is because Chinese people like to start off something like a one-line stub and just leave it there. --Deryck C. 10:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Hehe...generalizing a little? Maybe language barrier is an issue. It must be a little demoralizing to pour one's sweat into an article and then have someone like me come along, correct everything, and then complain that I had to correct everything (which I too often do rather than remembering the virtues of silence on certain matters). Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 10:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Discussion
Let's wait until we get more agreement on the whole deal with the hooks and the word "that" before making any changes to DYK. Also, I'm starting to dislike this whole shortening idea. Sure, it may make them sound better, but I preferred them when they were interesting and had dates and other particular names. I just lost interest in some of the articles, because the hooks seem so dry, as compared to the original DYK's.  Nish kid 64  03:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure, there's probably a middle ground here which is ideal. I might be "dumbing them down" too much. My DYK involvement is recent too. I’ve only been a contributor for 1 month. Someone submitted my Larz Anderson Bonsai Collection article without my knowledge and it was chosen. Only in the last few days have I taken an active roll in the DYK process: choosing articles for the next update, editing hooks so that they are sharp, and even vetoing stuff that is POV, not up to editorial standards or whatever. I know its probably just a matter of time before my honest efforts at quality-control in this regard enfuriate someone, but my fingers are crossed that it is later rather than sooner.

I have what is probably a very unusual Wikipedia guideline for myself: Write about what you don’t know. Write about what you don’t care about TOO much. When one has to research something, one is forced to find proper citations. When one doesn’t have a deep emotional involvement with an issue, one avoids the hyperbole, POV and resultant edit wars that characterize the worst stuff on Wikipedia. And thank you for the very flattering award! Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 04:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK : Picture slot
For a wider audience, I think Runamo might be more interesting and fun than the Historic House. That's why I think it should have the picture slot. If you disagree, you may always change the order. When it comes to Californian politicians, I couldn't agree more. From now, I'd suggest to include politician bios only if the politician has at least accomplished something worth mentioning. Camptown 20:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * To me, Runamo is pretty much how DYK used to be. How about increasing the size of the picture slightly? - The shape of the picture would probably allow a size up to 200x100px. Camptown 20:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Nikki Haley
Nish, you removed Nikki Haley on the basis of too much USA-centricism but replaced it with an article you created that is also USA based. Also, Haley was a first (the hook was ..that Nikki Haley is the first Indian American Republican legislator in the USA). I am having trouble believing she is less interesting than another article about a California or New Jersey politician with little special distinction. The Haley article wasn't expired - although it will be by the time of the next update. I am reluctant to bring this up, as I appreciate your great work at DYK and you flattered me greatly with a DYK award, but I am really confused by and uncomfortable with this choice. Can you offer some explanation that will set my concerns to rest? Thanks. House of Scandal 15:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * My DYK was removed yesterday per US-centrism. Mine was the next one up, and no one had updated in over 10 hours, so I quickly added my DYK as well as some other foreign-topic DYK's. Anyway, the DYK time rules (5 days) isn't something we have to strictly follow. We can cut some slack on DYK's when it's backlogged (which has been happening now because some people are adding 2-3 day old items to Next Update). Therefore, you can add entries even if they are expired by 1-2 days and are not problematic. Hope that answers your questions.  Nish kid 64  22:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Btw can you remove January 1st and replace them with Dec 31st? That way we can get all the DYK's that may be expired by a day or two in DYK soon.  Nish kid 64  22:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Your explanation does not address my concerns because your revision of 15:26, 5 January 2007 removed Nikki Haley with your comment "Add more, rm Nikki Haley since it's Jan 1st and i’m trying to remove US-centrism". That revision came 4 minutes (not ten hours) after the previous revision and was the same one in which you introduced your own Allan O. Hunter article. You can therefore say that you dumped my choice in favor of your choice of the article you had written because your article was written first, but the “US-centrism” comment baffles me because you replaced one US politician with another one in the very same edit. The DYK guidelines advise us against choosing our own articles. I noticed but didn’t object to Frederick R. Lehlbach, Henry Helstoski, Edward J. Patten, George N. Seger and Charles S. Joelson in less than a week, but when you dump my choice of an article with a nice hook in favor a guy with less DYK impact, you make me feel slighted, and if the Nikki Haley author was tuned into what was happening I bet he or she would  be pretty bummed out too. I don't dislike you because of this choice, it's not a big enough deal. But c'mon. Not cool.

Since we have more submissions per day than is needed, and 5 days isn't a deal-breaker, then we can afford to go with the best mix of the best articles with an eye towards the older one rather than scraping the barrel to post the oldest DYK's available. I think the DYK's that Camptown and I chose for today are a nice mix and to flush them for DYK’s that are a day older is unnecessary. Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 23:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * First of all, it is not fair to other people who expect their DYK on the Main Page and see their article not make it. And by the 10-hour update, I was talking about the real DYK, not the Next Update. Did you look at . I added mine in replacement of Nikki Haley, but as a result of the lack of DYK's at Next Update. It was only after did I realize that I might get hit with US-centrism claims, so I removed the newer one since it can go on the Main Page at a later date. Also, it is the point of DYK editors to pick which articles are good, and which aren't. Yes, we're trying to make them interesting, but removing entries solely because you don't think it's a good DYK is not a valid reason. DYK is a community effort, and leaving the decision to remove DYK's to a few editors was not the point intended. We're trying to accomodate all DYK's made; and if they are bad, we try to reword them to suit the Main Page standards. Also, I knew someone would probably complain about the fact that I added my own DYK to Next Update, but it wasn't intentional. Had there been someone else's DYK, like yours for example, I would have removed another entry and replaced it with this one. I'm sorry if you were offended by my actions, but I wasn't trying to hurt anyone. I was just trying to accomodate everyone's DYK's. When I first came to DYK, I thought there was a selection process for DYK, and I thought they weeded out boring DYK's from the list. I was wrong, and apparently, the goal is to get all suggestions on the Main Page (even if they are a day or two late). The Expired Noms section is more for problematic DYK's rather than DYK's that didn't make it because someone felt it was not interesting or appealing. If we did that, then people would complain that it is a biased process. Anyway, I hope this will help answer your question, and remove any dislike that you have for me now. =(  Nish kid 64  01:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I am also a bit disheartened by the fact that you removed one of my DYK's from Next Update and Suggestions. =( That wasn't the role of Next Update editors. It was just to help out with DYK, not pick DYK based on catchiness.  Nish kid 64  01:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, Đuro Kurepa is not a stub, and it was inaccurately tagged for speedy deletion. Your reply to that DYK was exactly what I was trying to point out before, about how DYK editors shouldn't decline DYK suggestions based on their appeal or interest.  Nish kid 64  01:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Its ok, Nikki Haley is up on mainpage. I am surprised that a prominent Indian American (Nish I know is desi as well) was replaced with a random guy with a wiki-article. If nothing she could be considered India related. I have been busy, but am tuned in now. As you said its not a big deal, but I will say I like the Malaysian court cases better than our series on NJ/CA politicians. But, perhaps you or camptown should go for admin (I have no chance) so that you guys can bring a fresh perspective on the template and the pages. Baka man  02:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It's my current understanding that neither Nish nor Camptown meant to remove Nikki Healy...it was supposedly a mistake that coincidentally happened twice in a row. As they are both good and reasonable editors, I'm inclined to believe this version of events.  And yeah, I know that Nish is Indian American, and it did strike me as odd that he flushed Nikki Healy unless he resents her marrying an Irishman (joking!).  Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 02:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Am I taking crazy pills?
No, no...there's no dislike of you on my part; I said as such and I meant it. In regards to the ideal selection process, I think it's a bit contradictory to say: ...it is the point of DYK editors to pick which articles are good'', and which aren't...but removing entries solely because you don't think it's a good DYK is not a valid reason. When an inferior article appears on the suggestion list, its our duty to pass it over. If a bad article makes it to "next update", its our duty to veto it and send it back to the pool. It is absolutely our responsibility to give preference to articles based on catchiness. Read the guidelines.

That's why you send out messages that say "An article which you started, or significantly expanded, was selected for DYK!" not "Okay, we posted your article on DYK because we couldn't find a reason not to."

You also just said: DYK editors shouldn't decline DYK suggestions based on their appeal or interest.

Huh? Am I taking crazy pills or isn't that exactly what our mandate is? It says right there on the DYK page that facts should be "Interesting to draw in a variety of readers around the world."

That being said, please understand that I don't think your articles are inferior. They are excellent, but in regards to what they concern of late (CA and NJ legislators), I think DYK has had all it can take this week. This sword cuts both ways: My article on Ani has been suggested by a couple people as worthy of inclusion. However, we've run Haghpat Monastery, Trdat the Architect and Tigranakert this past week. As much as I like getting my little yellow DYK kudos, I think we’ve given medieval Armenia enough attention for one week.

You said you were disheartened by the fact that I removed one of your DYK’s? Can I please reiterate that you removed my selection and replaced it with yours? I just changed it back. If you fail to see that you dissed me first, even if it was accidentally, then you’re tripping (...I couldn’t find an easy way to say that in formal English!)

To hopefully boil this down to a peaceful conclusion, you explained that you didn’t intentionally toss out my choice for in favor of your own. I totally accept that without reservation; all’s well.

Now, for the sake of DYK appeal rather than our own egos, let’s go at least another day without CA and NJ legislators, medieval Armenia or Malaysian court cases! Sound good? Contributions/HouseOfScandal House of Scandal HouseOfScandal 01:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I dunno, what would DYK be without Huang King vs. Malaya Courts, Therbert S. Goutcher or Ararat City? Baka man  02:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You were declining DYK's just because you thought they were boring. On the other hand, I thought they were quite interesting. It's all a matter of POV here and that's the problem. As for the DYK removal, I wasn't referring to the article, but to the actual fact. You removed one of my entries from Next Update just because it was another California guy, and you failed to send it back to the "main pool". You also commented on a nicely-expanded article saying it seemed stupid to say that a Czech math professor had lectured in all of the country's universities. As for the California/NJ stuff, I perfectly understand what you mean. I did stack DYK up with 12 or so articles on politicians in the last two weeks, and I just want to say that I'm done for now (making politician articles, that is). Regardless, you're overexaggerating here. We update DYK 3 times a day, and in two weeks it should have been updated around 42 times. One of my political DYK's appeared on the Main Page 12 out of those 42 times. That doesn't look like DYK saturation to me.


 * Anyway, as for the whole "disheartened" thing, I was talking about Cecil F. White, which you just removed from DYK and didn't even place back on the suggestion page. Also, I already told you why I removed your selection. This a community process, so people will be replacing entries from time to time. I don't know why you thought it was, but I wasn't trying to diss you. I had not even thought of the expectation of any such reaction. At least, when I removed Nikki Haley, I put it back on the suggestions page and I had planned to use it for the next DYK update. You removed Cecil F. White completely, and it never appeared on DYK because you hadn't replaced it at suggestions. As for the DYK repetition, what can I say? We're dishing out articles on particular topics of interest...topics that we can write about, and so they would naturally appear on DYK. I make all these articles so people will get to hear about these people, and wander into the article and make some good-faith changes. Meh, that's just my take on all the comments you made. Sorry that I'm responding a bit late, but I just saw this section of your talk page (I missed it, previously).  Nish kid 64  19:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Not placing your suggestion back in the pool was just an oversight. By now you should understand that the software we use made it appear like you removed my suggestion and immediately replaced it with your own. At that moment, making sure your DYK went back into the pool just slipped my mind. DYK doesn't get updated as often as you say, but I'm not going to quibble about that...I think we may both be skewing the numbers based on equally honest guesswork. It seems you really disagree with my position that not all good articles are DYK worthy. I've written like 200 articles: I submit less than 10% of them. That doesn't mean the other 90% are shit. It just means that (for example) because I wrote about a dozen different parks in Massachusetts doesn't mean a selection of articles for a global audience should feature a dozen different parks in Massachusetts in 2 weeks. It guess you think every article you write should be on DYK. That doesn't make you a bad person, and you do write well, but I obviously disagree on that point. We also disagree about what is a worthwhile hook. Being a big shot Yugoslavian math guy and talking about math at most of that country's college is expected. It's like saying the bishop-so-and so used to be a priest or or that prince so-and-so has royal blood. But disagreeing isn't the same as having animosity, and we're both on the same team, so I hope all's well and we'll continue to work together in DYK and wherever else our paths might cross here. House of Scandal 19:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I had actually added 3 DYK's and removed Nikki Haley (I think). About DYK, my number is roughly accurate. It should be ideally updated 4 times a day, but since I do 2 updates a day, and another random admin does one, it equates to 21 updates a week, approximately. I don't write articles as frequently as you do, and I try to put a lot of time an effort into my articles, which is why I submit them for DYK (which is also why almost all of my articles are around 7-10 KB). I know other articles aren't of the same quality, but some of them are still decent (like the Yugoslav math guy). For the future, I think it's best if we try to find another interesting hook from the article, and that way the well-written article can still be on the Main Page. Now that we have reconciled our differences, I hope we can work together to make DYK great.  Nish kid 64  20:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Ouch! Okay, my articles about Landmarks Foundation and Shambala aren't exactly War and Peace! But on the other hand, Hazel Lavery, Ani and Edmonson sisters took some work. (c;    And the Eastern European math guy was like two sentences when I looked, that's why I thought he was safe to use as an example.  Anyway, now we've got a Nigerian math guy who's article could use a little more meat on its bones.  Take a look at it if you're in the mood.  House of Scandal 20:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC) House of Scandal 20:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Apparently, I should reworded my sentence there. By no means was I saying that your work is shoddy. In fact, I am a fan of your article-writing, and I was just talking about your statement before about my thoughts on every article that I make being on DYK. I was just saying that I put a lot of work into my articles, and I like to see them on DYK.  Nish kid 64  21:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, where the heck do you get your article ideas? I know you said that you write about things that normally wouldn't be written about, where do you find your inspiration lol? I mean seriously...some of it is so random.  Nish kid 64  21:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't fret. I was teasing. There's a smiley face in the above comments. Thanks for the kind words. House of Scandal 21:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Smiley face? Where? And can you answer the other question, too? Thanks.  Nish kid 64  21:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Hot 8 DYK
Thanks! I knew somebody out there must have known more about this group. Cmprince 00:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm glad I could help. However, like most things I write about, I didn't know a damn thing about the Hot 8 Brass Band.  I just used my web browser and found what I could.  House of Scandal 00:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  01:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK Sajama Lines
Thank you for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  00:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Your DYK list
Hate to be a killjoy, but while I was looking at your DYK template design I noticed that you are using some fair use images which is a no-no...and have dumped that problem I fly off to cause misery elsewhere. Cheers, Yomangani talk 00:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Self-nom in DYK
Thanks for notifying me the purpose of the notice. Hope my entry will pass! --Deryck C. 08:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK
The timer said 9 hours... Savidan 01:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Nishkid forgot to hit the timer, but it looks like he's already fixed it now. I guess I'll check the history from now on too. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Savidan 01:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Queen of Japan DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  00:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Ball culture DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  22:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Prince Joseph Wenzel of Liechtenstein DYK
There is not now and never is likely to be a project directly relating to Liechtenstein. Also, unfortunately, the quality of the majority of the Liechtenstein articles is not really at all good. By having them assessed and included in the scope of a project, they might receive a bit more attention, particularly if individuals interested in Liechtenstein joined the project. The France project has just recently expanded to include Andorra and Monaco on a similar basis. Eventually, when I get the articles lists together for all these projects, they can also be checked for improvements, vandalism, and other changes. I wish the country were large enough to get its own project, but I really can't see that ever happening, and having an interested project is better than not having one. I hope anyway. Badbilltucker 18:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Prince Joseph Wenzel of Liechtenstein under WikiProject Switzerland? I'm guessing there must not be a Wikipedia:WikiProject Liechtenstein so we toss the L'steins in with the Swiss?  House of Scandal 18:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool. No objections.  BTW, I've noticed you've made several minor edits to articles I made in the past week.  Thanks for the attention, my work often needs tweaking.  House of Scandal 18:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Push It to the Limit DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  23:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the help in my first Wikipedia experience. It was a bit of a trial by fire, but you were far more helpful that people like Nareklm, who just yell and I am conviced have an agenda. I think I've got a much better understanding.--Optimussven 23:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Sexual cannibalism DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  02:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Creobroter DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  22:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Hawayo Takata DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  00:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Adam Bruce on DYK
Great work on the Adam Bruce article. I started it about a year ago, but you did a fine job expanding it. Well done.-- Eva  b  d  22:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please don't add honourifics like the hon in the main in line as this goes against the manual of style. Manual_of_Style_(biographies) Alci12 16:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Poecilostomatoida
Looks much better now (I thought about putting them in a table in the text, but I was feeling lazy too). Yomangani talk 13:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

World Association of Copepodologists DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  22:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK
-- Yomangani talk 10:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Leonard Crofoot DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  18:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

James Palacio DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  23:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Dralasite DYK
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  15:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK J-ska
--Savidan 00:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK x2
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  19:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Poecilostomatoida DYK
Thanks for your contributions! Keep up the great work, House!  Nish kid 64  00:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It is the DYK King Markco1 05:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Lol, thanks. That was my 40th DYK. House of Scandal 05:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * DUDE! 40th!!! I had no idea. I thought I was doing OK with about 25 in about a year, but you're cranking!!! Keep up the great work! ++Lar: t/c 14:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Banjee DYK
-   - {| class="messagebox -talk" - |-  - |   - |On February 1, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Banjee, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. - |}   -    - Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  15:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC) -   -    - HoS the picture you took is on main page! I was going to say "I hope you return soon" but rather I'll say take whatever length of Wikibreak you need and return bright-eyed and bushy-tailed when ready! Shaundakulbara 17:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC) - :Wow, he took that picture?!? Lucky him!.....err, I mean, what a lovely picture. :-) Jeffpw 20:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)  - ::And may I add my "Mmmmmmm!" to that? :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  20:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)