User:Boydak13/Environmental Epigenetics - Nutrition/Wteh Peer Review

General info
Keijondra, Gjimenez21, Doni Devi Thingujam, FCollins95
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Sex reversal
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sex reversal

Evaluate the drafted changes
This lead include an introductory sentence that are concisely and clearly describes the article's topic; and it is concise, straightforward, not overly detailed. The content added is up-to-date, nothing missing in this article but the only thing about this article is that it could be more added to this article. The content is backed by reliable secondary source of information, the links on the article also work perfectly; sources are current and thorough. Content is well-written and straightforward the only con about it is more content can be added to it (ex: include more vertebrates), everything is well organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major point of the topic.