User:Boynextdior222/Queer Newark Oral History Project/PTX3026 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Boynextdior222
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Boynextdior222/Queer Newark Oral History Project
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

(Remember to add the references on this page)
 * The lead on your article is very clear and easy to read!
 * The first two sentences give me a clear sense of what the reader will be reading.
 * I think the only thing that needs to be rechecked is the part where you mentioned "access."
 * Did you mean that QNOHP wants individuals to have a chance of being apart of the LGBTQ community?
 * The quality of the article body is very straight-forward. I would recommend adding more information to the research the have found have done with other partners. That would add more to the interesting topic as a whole.
 * The quality of the article body is very straight-forward. I would recommend adding more information to the research the have found have done with other partners. That would add more to the interesting topic as a whole.
 * The quality of the article body is very straight-forward. I would recommend adding more information to the research the have found have done with other partners. That would add more to the interesting topic as a whole.

(Add information on Rutgers and Darnell helping out.)

Historical contex could be added more, to give the reader a background history