User:Brabblegreyhound03/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Teresa Camacho Badani

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I thought evaluating the page of a biologist would be informative and interesting. This article matters because it is a page about a biologist that does important work with endangered frogs. My initial impression of the article was that it was short, but there may not be much more information out there, especially when it comes to private citizens such as Badani.

Evaluate the article

 * The lead section of the article is very concise in summarizing the topic. The lead sentence summarizes it well, but is a little long.
 * All of the content is relevant to the topic of Badani's career in conservation. The sources look to be up to date, and there is nothing that strikes me as something that doesn't belong in the article.
 * Article is written from a neutral point of view. The sections about Badani's conservation work are all informative and do not suggest a side to take on the subject-matter. No over- or under-representation.
 * All information is backed up by reliable sources. Sources are diverse and there aren't any 'random' looking websites. Links all seem to be in working order throughout the article.
 * The article is easy to read and understand, even from outside a science perspective. There are some grammatical errors that could be fixed such as double spaced words. Sections are well labeled.
 * Images included in the article pertain to the subject matter, such as a picture of the frog Badani works with as well as a picture of herself. Images are visually appealing and properly cited. There is only one image in the body of the article where her work is discussed, but it is relevant and well captioned.
 * There are currently no discussions about the article being held on the Talk page, although it is included in three separate WikiProjects.
 * I believe this article is a very good foundation for a biographical article. It is a little underdeveloped, but I believe that it could be expanded with more current information and updates on Badani's work.