User:Braedensb/Processor (computing)/Sticky MD Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Braedensb/Processor (computing)
 * Processor (computing)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like the inclusion of photonic processors. It is immediately obvious to me that this is relevant to CPU's. I remember reading your research paper so I understand the inclusion of Moore's law but it is not immediately obvious why this is important. Expanding on the why part would be helpful. I didn't check every source but it looks like they work, make sure they are unbiased or that you disclaim the biases. Also, I'm not sure if maybe it makes sense in context but the part about Moore's law says, "The progress of processors has followed Moore's law closer." That doesn't make much sense to me, maybe you're trying to say that it closely follows Moore's law? I would encourage you to double check the grammar.