User:Braelynnd/Evaluate an Article

Article: Problematic social media use

Lead Section:

The lead section is robust and sets up the article and includes important details. But it does not encompass a direct sentence that concisely describes topic. It instead jumps into the robust details of studies.

Content:

Article has very good content and has many findings to back up stances.

Tone and Balance:

Article aims to persuade people that excessive use of phone can lead to bad outcomes. Article seems very set on readers forming the opinion that based on research media use can lead to bad outcomes.

Sources and References:

Yes, the article uses good sources and adequately explains the findings of the sources.

Organization:

Article could use some work on conciseness. Some parts are unendingly drawn out.

Photos:

The one photo used is captioned correctly.

Talk:

Talk page is short, but does include additions to the page in regard to more detail of stages that media use can have.

Overall Impressions:

Overall a good article. Could really just use help in conciseness.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)