User:Brandnerd

Regarding my Dannon edit. The study and information from the Milestones study has been available since February and has not been sold to anyone or any company. I do not work for Kadence and have never received any money from them. But it seems to me the proper editorial question should be, does the information in the article provide interesting, worthwhile, and objective information to the person wishing to learn about the Dannon brand in the U.S.? It should not be about motivations, unless one claims to be a mindreader. Also, it seems to me that much of the text I have found in some of the Wikipedia company and brand writeups is puffery that is not objective and probably has been submitted by P.R. personnel of the company. I am trying to inject a dose of nitty-gritty, totally objective factualism into some of these writeups.