User:Brandon R Hill/Addiction psychology/Mikesettepani Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Brandon R Hill


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added was relevant to the topic and added more specific information on a treatment modality that was not originally in the article. The section that was added to was labeled "Treatment", gave a very vague overview of addiction treatment as a whole. The edits made talked about a specific treatment method and also gave an example of his this would be implemented which is something this section was lacking before. Overall, the contributions were relevant to the topic, were easy to read and understand, and added valuable information to the page.