User:Brandonjohnson2/Imagine That (film)/ShonteDS Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Brandonjohnson2
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Imagine That (film)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? I was unable to locate new info added by peer
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? The lead does a wonderful job giving a summary of the article and topic
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? There is no info in the lead that is not discussed within the article
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is perfectly concise

Lead evaluation
Overall, the lead is concise and properly leads the reader into the content of the article and topic. It will just need to be updated if any new sections are added to the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? n/a
 * Is the content added up-to-date? n/a
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The mention about Murphy's previously failed movie is not relevant here as the article is about this film and not Eddie Murphy. Furthermore, the accolades listed should be that of the movie rather than of the actor.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? n/a
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Heavily biased towards the failure of the movie.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The failures of the movie and lead actor are overrepresented, which leads to a biased that author of the article wants to persuade the reader that the movie is unfavorable. It would be less biased if the article included details about good areas of performance in the movie as well.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? n/a

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? n/a
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization evaluation
I was unable to identify any added content yet, but in regards to organization of the article, I would like to see the characters listed before the plot. I would also prefer the Murphy's comments about the movie's performance to be listed in the critical response subsection of the article.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Images and media evaluation
No added images but the current image adds value to the article

Overall evaluation
It would be helpful to add more sources about the successes of the movie to remove the bias from the article. The article could also benefit from reorganization and less info about the lead character. More history about the origins or creation or idea for the move may be relevant as well.