User:Braydencrismon/Social motility/Simarv Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Braydencrismon + group
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Braydencrismon/Social motility

Lead
There isn't a Lead section per-se, but the content under the "social motility heading" could serve as one. So surely, by the time the article is finalized it can be organized to resemble even more a proper wikipedia article.

Treating the "social motility heading" as the lead, the introductory sentence is not as concise as it could be. To explain, the word motile refers to a microbes ability to move. Writing "...motile movement..." seems redundant. Moreover, the lead does not mention the "Examples of Social Motility" section and it includes a lot of information that is not in the article. This is a good start though.

Content
The content is pertinent and a mix of current and not so current. To elaborate, one of the sources is nine-years-old. This is likely not a significant issue, but a more recent source would likely provide more relevant information. Sections for gliding motility and twitching motility should be added.

Tone and Balance
The structure is sound, but some information and content are missing as it appears the article is still not finalized.

There seems to be a biased opinion towards African Trypanosomes, or Myxobacteria, but the statements are supported by two of the three references.

Sources and References
All references are proper and functional. The sources chosen are reputable, peer reviewed and reliable. However, one of them is relatively old (as mentioned above).

The links for the references work as they should.

Organization
The content is fairly easy to read, but contains a few minor grammatical errors (one of which was noted above). The content seems to be well organized.

New Article Criteria
The article appears to meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements because it has two reliable secondary sources cited. However, the list is not exhaustive. More sources can likely be found. The article does a good job of linking to the "Swarming motility" article. The article may not follow the same pattern of similar articles, but it is still being composed. It is likely that this will change as the writing process continues.

Overall impressions
The article has great potential and is well thought out, just needs more content to be more complete. The content under the first heading has a couple subject-verb disagreements, other than that all is fine. The topic is interesting and definitely "wikipedia notable".