User:Brays.world/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Plagues and Peoples

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I chose this article because it is related to my course.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) Lead Section: Yes, the lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. Yes, the lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections. No, the lead does not include information that is not in the article. The lead is concise.

Content: Yes, the article's content is relative to the topic. Yes, I believe the content is up-to-date, the last edit was made at the beginning of this year. Yes, the article is in need of addition citations for verifications and, yes there is content missing. No, the article does not deal with equity gaps, the article discusses well know plaques and people.

Tone and Balance: Yes, the article is neutral. No, there are not any biased claims in the article. No, there are no views viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. Yes, minor viewpoints accurately describe as such. No, the author does not tempt to persuade the reader in anyway.

Source and References: No, all the facts are not backed up by a reliable source. No, the sources are not through. No the source is not current. No the source comes from a newspaper article. Yes, there is better sources available for this content.

Organization and writing quality: Yes, the article is well-written. No, the article does not have any spelling errors. Yes, the article is well-organized.

Images and media: The article includes the cover of the book. Yes, the image is well captioned. Yes, the image adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. There is only one image and it is of the cover of the book.

Talk page discussion: There are no conversations going on, on the talk page. The article is rated a "stub". Yes, it is part of a wiki project. Wikipedia does not go into depth the way we talk about plagues in class.

Overall impressions: The articles strengths are it offers insight on the books key information. I believe the article can be improved by expanding its knowledge of the book. I would access the articles completeness as undeveloped.