User:Brb0305/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Writing about Writing:
 * Article Evaluation
 * Short lead section, but effective in giving a definition of the topic
 * Topic abbreviated to WAW in first sentence so it's easy to follow throughout the article
 * History section divided into subheadings
 * Quotes and cites specific articles referenced
 * Authors referenced could have more background information for reliability
 * Writing about Writing: A College Reader second paragraph is clunky in how it lists the questions the book asks
 * Strong list of selected readings, but further readings could be expanded
 * Good reference list
 * Slight bias in reception section
 * No images, but not necessarily needed
 * Sources
 * https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fk9w7ws https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5vd439g1 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3t26956c  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10572252.2017.1339524  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10572250701588681
 * https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fk9w7ws https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5vd439g1 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3t26956c  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10572252.2017.1339524  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10572250701588681

Option 2

 * Document comparison:
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead section is simple but effective in defining the topic and giving brief examples
 * Uses table in overview section to clearly explain and differentiate different types of documents
 * Great use of subheadings within the sections to divide into smaller topics
 * Lacks citations in all sections - essential to credibility
 * Only one page in "see also"
 * Only one internal reference and two sources
 * Overall well-organized, but severely lacks sources
 * Sources
 * https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01330
 * https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f94n64r
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10982140221136486
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10982140221136486

Option 3

 * Collaborative writing:
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead section could be more expansive to introduce topics in headings
 * Great use of headings to divide into smaller sections
 * Inconsistency in bullet points between sentences and fragments
 * History section is only two sentences
 * Is the word "extremely" neutral?
 * Only one image in the middle of the article
 * "Collaborative writing as an educational tool" much longer than other sections
 * Very detailed references page
 * Sources
 * https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7441493c
 * https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4sf0s233
 * https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0bh1s43v
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2190/TW.38.4.c
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2190/TW.42.3.f:
 * https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2190/TW.42.3.f: