User:Brbs4303/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Seaweed:
 * Article Evaluation
 * -The articles content is relevant to the topic, it is up to date, complete and written in an unbiased manner. Citations and references are provided consistently throughout the article, aren't outdated and are thorough while staying on topic. Although in one instance within the Ecology section a citation is required. A wide variety of the different types of seaweed are discussed and pictures are provided of each to give extra clarity on classifying seaweed.
 * Information is lacking in the Production and Uses sub categories and can be elaborated on in more depth. An addition to the Production category could be how is it farmed and cultivated? What is the process? Another area of improvement would be to check the links to the definitions listed. When reading through the Food sub category I required a definition of a word that didn't display.
 * Sources
 * https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24697280/, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653517300747, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24305152/
 * https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24697280/, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653517300747, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24305152/

Option 2

 * Wind Power:
 * Article Evaluation
 * -The content in the article is relevant to the topic. The article has plenty of sources with some requiring citations on some claims and some of the claims that have a citation could have better sources, such as when discussing various renewable energy sources. The article provides plenty of information and is well developed. It dives into many different aspects related to wind power, for example it dives into the anatomy of wind turbines and additionally highlights its relation to politics, the impact it has on the surrounding environment, and economics associated with wind power in comparison to fossil fuel projects. The article is written neutrally, it weighs both the pros and cons of wind power.:
 * Sources
 * https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/15/3764

Option 3

 * Bamboo:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content within the article is relevant to the topic and has a mix of up to date and outdated sources. The article is very well developed and provides lots of information that is backed up with reliable sources. Images provide further explanation of what is being discussed and enhances the article overall. There are instances with claims in the article where citations are needed such as is the Ecology section. This article was written with a neutral point of view on the subject.
 * Sources
 * https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.229 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c18239 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.201906308
 * https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fes3.229 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c18239 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.201906308

Option 4

 * Fertilizer:
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is very well developed. There are plenty of sources but a majority of them require updating as many of them are outdated although they are reliable. New findings on this topic may have transpired which could add more information and spark debate. Pictures and table are provided throughout providing facts and a clearer image to the reader. Besides on a few occasions, all claims were backed by citations and are consistent. This article is written from a neutral point of view.
 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479723012823, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479722021752
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479723012823, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479722021752

Option 5

 * Sea Salt:
 * Article Evaluation
 * This articles content is relevant to the topic but it is underdeveloped. Many of the sources used are outdated and can use more up to date information. Additionally, a citation is missing from one claim provided in the Taste category and some of the sources are unreliable. The article is written from a neutral point of view.:
 * Sources
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-41639-8