User:Bread6/Chemical Biology/Fanaryne Peer Review

General info
The usename is Bread6.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Bread6's draft
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chemical biology
 * Chemical biology

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead sentence/ paragraph:

The article starts off with a strong lead sentence, and clearly distinguishes between chemical biology and biochemistry. Relevant hyperlinks have been added. The lead sentence is relevant to the topic. And since chemical biology is confused with biochemistry, a section can be dedicated to highlight their differences.

Other:

- A very detailed and relevant history section talks about the evolution of the topic.

- List of nobel prize winners is a great addition to the article. However, these could be formatted in a table such as the one in this article: List of Nobel laureates.

- The content is relevant so far but different subsections can be added to further discuss about the topic from various angles. Suggested subsections are down below (in 'missing info').

- The tone is neutral and is not biased towards any particular position.

Missing Information:

-Some suggestion for the article body since it is incomplete:

> Ethical and Societal Implications:


 * Discuss ethical considerations related to research in chemical biology, including issues concerning animal testing and genetic modification.
 * Address the societal impact of chemical biology, such as its contributions to healthcare, biotechnology, and environmental science.

> A section on the application of chemical biology. Images can be added to illustrate these applications.

Citations:

- Relevant and recent citations have been added as well as older articles are referenced, relevant to the History section.

- A proper section dedicated to the reference is included at the end of the article.

- Primary literature sources are included

Overall:

- Since the old article has a heavy section on systems of interest and seems to already cover a broad area of the topic, the new article could simply build on that. The History section just has to be added to make the article more complete.