User:Bread6/Chemical Biology/Les42342 Peer Review

General info
(Bread6)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bread6/Chemical_Biology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_biology

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I really enjoyed the history section added, I think it added some needed context into how the term came to be used, however I believe DNA is within the scope of biochemistry and not chemistry. From what I understand about biochemistry it serves as the study of the midpoint between the size of biology and chemistry, where chemistry studies a smaller scale. Obviously there is overlap but I think the urea example was better. I’m not sure about the relevance of the Nobel prize winners, as it really doesn’t help readers understand the topic itself and I’m pretty sure other articles in Wikipedia on science fields don’t include a section dedicated to Nobel Prize winners but maybe instead would go into the research said Nobel prize winners did. If I were doing this article I would pick fewer Nobel prize winners and go more in depth and have a section on notable research.

I also don’t really know how new of a field chemical biology is since it’s just chemistry applied to biological systems not a unique field per se. Idk I’m not an expert though.