User:Breannapalmer/Nellie McClung/Tjones97 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) breannapalmer
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Breannapalmer/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? I do not think so!
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Not really, its in point form and she addresses that she wants to update and add an education and family section
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes, in point form
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? not really
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? no, point form

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes!
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes!
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No specific sources added yet.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? n/a
 * Are the sources current? n/a
 * Check a few links. Do they work? No links

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Point form but good start
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Good start

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Not yet but she said she had technical issues!
 * Are images well-captioned? n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes but not fully because of point form
 * What are the strengths of the content added? She will be exploring new topics within the subject and I think that will be very beneficially
 * How can the content added be improved? I think as we continue in this project her content will improve! Good job on the start Breanna!

Overall evaluation
I think that you did a great thing by choosing to not really improve on the things that already have been written about McClung since she is so well known and famous. The section(s) that you will add I think will be a great way for more individuals to learn more about her and not what she did! I think you have a great start here and I will continue to be here to help you with any questions you may have!