User:BreezyLBM/sandbox

Article Name w/link

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * not really
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * What else could be improved?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Talk Page
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? not really

C. Beccaria was a distraction

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

For Uggen there is info linked with his name, yet Inderbitzen have nothing. Maybe link some info to Inderbitzen as well as Gregg Barak.

What else could be improved?

C. Beccaria needs to go.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? most of the info I feel is neutral. When reading the "talk" section titled history one person added some insight on C.Beccaria. They mentioned the needs portion needs to be renamed because of pushing an opinion.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? not to my knowledge

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? not all of them

when you click on "moral entrepreneurs," is says that the page does not exist

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Nigel South there is a "cite error" shows in red.

Talk Page What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? One person added their opinion. I feel they should have shown concern in a different way. I feel he/she attacked this piece rather than trying to help or improve it. It clearly states a class was working on it, yet I guess he/she just decided to over look that part.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It closely relates to the work we have done in class. I think its great to have another perspective on the cite.