User:Breigh Hanks/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
George Bridgetower

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I feel like I could add more to the compositions area of his life. There is only one work actually listed then a reference out to another article with the rest of the list. Even though the list is very short I feel like even the addition of one more composition would help lengthen and add more information to the article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article does really well with covering all the points in his life that were written about. The information is detailed and is written from a neutral point of view and the information wasn't skewed. There isn't necessarily any information missing but I do feel like there could be more in the composition tab. There was only one work listed and while there is only a few of his compositions recorded in journals and books, I feel like more than one could be listed. When I read that section it felt like I had to go somewhere else like the article left in the section to go read more and I feel like that could be eliminated. If it ends up not being eliminated we could leave it but add one or two more titles and information of his compositions so readers are getting more information from one place. When it comes to images, there are only portraits but that's not a bad thing. I think that them being placed along the sides was a good idea because you can still read and not have to scroll past them to the next thing.

I looked at the talk page and there seems to be beneficial conversations between other editors about misinformation and there are questions about information that could be edited or why is was edited. I would feel comfortable using this to engage with other editors to ask questions or just to simply make an edit.

Overall, I think this article is doing well when it comes to being written. The information is from updated sources, the links work, and there are multiple editors working together to make sure it is the best article it can be when it comes to being accurate and neutral.