User:Brendalynfigueira/Ableism/Cvarsam Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Do not see any additions to the lead section in the sandbox, however, the lead in the article itself provides a good background on the definition of ableism without going too in depth (which the body of the article later provides).

Content

The added content is relevant to the topic of ableism. Discussing the history, as well as current depictions of ableism are both good additions to the topic.

Tone and Balance

Added content is discussed in a neutral tone; no bias or imbalances that I recognized.

Sources and References

References stem from reliable sources and are relatively recent.

Organization

The article itself has an extensive number of sections, all discussing the topics in a decent amount.

Images and Media

The added image is relevant for the history behind ableism, however, I would be more specific in the caption and highlight that it is from Nazi, Germany.

Overall Impressions

Well written additions to the article. The topic of Ableism already had extensive content in the wikipedia article, however, the added content made the article did not add any unnecessary information. Good work!