User:BrettKuzmicz/Orogenic gold deposit/ChloejWard Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

BrettKuzmicz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BrettKuzmicz/Orogenic_gold_deposit?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Orogenic gold deposit

Lead

 * the user has not made any changes to the lead section in the pre-exisiting article

Content

 * The content added seemed very thorough. Personally, the section on mineralogy and geochemistry felt dense and hard for me to understand personally without previous knowledge of the subject.
 * As well as the timeline of Emplacement was dense in information
 * As far as my understanding, the information added seems relevant to the existing article and expands on topics which were not prior mentioned

Tone and Balance

 * There is mention of environmental impact but it is done so in an unbiased way with a source to back up the statement
 * Overall, the content added is presented as facts and unbiased with supporting sources for each statement made.

Organization

 * The user structured their information added well. They included new sections with relevant details in each
 * The content added is well written but difficult to ingest without previous knowledge on the subject
 * A change in language or further expansion / links to definitions could be usefull to add

Overall Impression

 * Overall, it is clear the user has done extensive research on this subject and has collected many reliable sources. I think they could benefit by making some of the information more concise if possible.
 * They did a really great job at finding information that was useful to the preexisting article and adding a well written contribution