User:BrettKuzmicz/Orogenic gold deposit/Eeclem Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

@BrettKuzmicz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * The draft is linked here.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The current version of the article is linked here.

Content
Content is both relevant and neutral. I appreciated the addition of an 'Economics' section and a 'Timeline of Global Emplacement' section, which are not present in the article as it currently exists, but are both important veins of information for this topic.

Tone and Balance
The content is neutral and unbiased. When reading, I didn't feel as though I was being persuaded, but simply being provided an overview of the topic.

Sources and References
Most of this draft is well cited, however, there are a few claims that are left without citation. The reference list is cumulative.

Organization
The draft is well organized, with clearly indicated headings. It looks as though the user has taken time to care for any grammatical and spelling errors, as none were obvious.

Images and Media
There are no images or media included in this draft, but I don't think any are truly necessary in regards to the information included here.

Overall, the edits made to this article are well done and the additions are thoughtful and relevant. The main thing that this draft could benefit from is some more care taken to adding further in-text citations so that no claims are left without citation.